[ad_1]
Heard Sri S. Vijaya Prashanth, learned counsel for the revision
petitioners and Sri G. Ravi Chandran, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This is a revision preferred by the petitioners/plaintiffs aggrieved by
the order passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Choutuppal (‘trial
Court’), in I.A.No.236 of 2023 in O.S.No.235 of 2022, wherein the petition
filed under Section 151 of CPC seeking the relief of grant of police aid
with a direction to the Station House Officer, Choutuppal, to provide police
protection in implementation of order passed in I.A.No.585 of 2022, dated
09.09.2022, has been dismissed.
3. The revision petitioners have filed suit for perpetual injunction
against the respondents herein along with an application seeking ad interim
injunction to restrict the interference with the suit schedule property. The
trial Court granted ex parte ad interim injunction by order dated 09.09.2022
in I.A.No.582 of 2022 and the same was continuing. Thereafter, the
respondents filed counter and written statement in the main suit. While so,
on 10.07.2023 the respondents along with others allegedly tried to enter
into the land of the revision petitioners and dispossess them. The said
RY,J
CRP_2402_2024
attempts were resisted by the revision petitioners and the respondents
threatened to come again and occupy the property forcibly. When the
revision petitioners approached the SHO, Choutuppal, to take necessary
action, the police refused to do so, on the pretext that the dispute is civil in
nature. Therefore, the revision petitioners filed I.A.No.236 of 2023 before
the trial Court seeking police protection.
[ad_2]
Source link