Chiranji Lal Gurjar Son Of Shri Kalyan … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:18940) on 5 May, 2025

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Chiranji Lal Gurjar Son Of Shri Kalyan … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:18940) on 5 May, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:18940]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2653/2025
1.       Chiranji Lal Gurjar Son Of Shri Kalyan Sahay, Aged About
         45 Years, Resident Of Rohit Nagar First, Jaisinghpura
         Khor, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.       Indraj Gurjar Son Of Late Shri Mool Chand, Aged About
         43 Years, Resident Of Main Bus Stand, Jaisinghpura Khor,
         Jaipur, Rajasthan.
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.       Kanahiya Lal Mehra Son Of Shri Devi Lal Mehra, Aged
         About 55 Years, Resident Of 30, Mehra Basti, Karbla
         Choraha, Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment

05/05/2025

1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a

prayer to quash the FIR No. 86/2025 registered at Police Station

Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur North for offences under Sections

318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, on the basis of

compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of

their inter-se dispute.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their

respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is

inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties

amicably.

3. Heard and considered.

4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place

reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

(Downloaded on 07/05/2025 at 09:53:46 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:18940] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2653/2025]

Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and

Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in

[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced

below:

“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have
amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly
consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable.”

5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex

Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature

of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this

Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.

Compromise is taken on record.

6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal

miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 86/2025

registered at Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur North with all

consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.

7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending

application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

8. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to send a certified copy of this

order to the officers of Rajasthan Registration and Stamps

Department and Income Tax Department for verification of the

amount in question i.e. Rs. 2,64,000/- approx.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /107

(Downloaded on 07/05/2025 at 09:53:46 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)