Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Chiranjilal S/O Dhannalal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23300) on 17 June, 2025
Author: Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2025:RJ-JP:23300]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 829/2025
Chiranjilal S/o Dhannalal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Janta Basti
Niwai, Police Station Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.).
---Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Dhanju for
Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Laddha
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, P.P.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)
Order
17/06/2025
1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
accused petitioner under Section 482 B.N.S.S. in connection with
FIR No.67/2019 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District
Bundi for offence under Sections 420, 406, 384, 506, 467, 468,
2. Heard and considered.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused
petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further
submits that the call details collected by the Investigating Agency
does not show any connection of the accused petitioner with the
other accused. He also submits that no purpose will be served by
sending the accused-petitioner in custody as no recovery has to
be made from the accused-petitioner.
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:45:03 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23300] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-829/2025]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail
application and submits that as per investigation report, the
accused-petitioner along with other co-accused have collected
more than two crores of rupees from the unemployed youth for
getting them the Government employment. He further submits
that the accused-petitioner required custodial interrogation as the
allegations against the accused-petitioner are of serious nature.
5. Having considered the allegations against the petitioner and
gravity of the offences, this Court is not inclined to extend the
benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J
GAURAV/261
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:45:03 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)