Cholamandalam Investment And Finance … vs Anand N on 3 April, 2025

0
32

:

This is the complaint instituted by the complainant

against the accused under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence

punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act-

1881.

2. The Case of the complainant as per complaint
averments is as follows:

The complainant is a company registered under the

Companies Act, 1956 and provides loan facility to its

SCCH-10

customers. The accused approached the complainant company

and availed the loan of Rs.6,74,000/- on 26.08.2022 by entering

into a Loan agreement and purchased M 575 DI XP PLUS-47

HP vehicle. The accused is a chronic defaulter in payment

ofmonthly installments, as a result, said vehicle was

repossessed, which was hypothecated in favour of complainant

and was sold it on highest market value of Rs.5,10,000/- and

same was appropriated to due amount. On adjusting the sale

proceeds, the accused was due a sum of Rs.1,40,807/- including

interest to the complainant company. After repeated request,

in discharge of his liability, the accused has issued a cheque for

the said amount and when the said cheque was presented,

same has been returned dishonoured with an endorsement

“Drawers Signature differs”. Thereafter, the complainant got

issued a legal notice calling upon the accused to pay the

amount covered under the cheque. Despite receipt of notice, the

accused has not paid the cheque amount. Thus, the accused

SCCH-10

has committed the offence punishable U/Sec.138 of Negotiable

Instruments Act. Hence, this complaint.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here