Company Limited vs Mainul Sk And Anr on 5 August, 2025

0
2


It appears that one Mr. Shyamal Mukhopadhyay, learned Advocate had

entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. On the last occasion,

the said learned advocate was absent. Under such circumstances, the

petitioner was directed to issue a notice upon Mr. Shyamal

Mukhopadhyay. Notice by special messenger had been served in the

office of Mr. Shyamal Mukhopadhyay and one Ms. Priyanka Chatterjee,

Advocate received the said notice on July 25, 2025 on behalf of Mr.

Mukhopadhyay. This matter has been running in the monthly list.

2. Under such circumstances, let this matter be taken up in the absence of

the respondents.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here