Chattisgarh High Court
Dabal @ Chandradeep Jaiswal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 13 June, 2025
1
2025:CGHC:23898
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRR No. 309 of 2016
Dabal @ Chandradeep Jaiswal S/o Thakur Prasad Aged About 28 Years R/o Naya
Bus Stand, Nagar Panchayat Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.
... Applicant
Digitally
signed by
ANJANI versus
KUMAR
ALLENA
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Pratappur,
Date:
2025.06.16
10:12:05 District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh.
+0530
.. Non-applicant
For Applicant : Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate.
For Respondent/State : Ms. Pragya Pandey, Deputy G.A.
For Complainants : Shri Aman Upadhyay, Advocate.
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL)
Order on Board
13/06/2025
1. Heard on I.A. No.2/2025, application under under Section 320 IPC/Section
316(4) of B.N.S.S. for compromise the matter.
2. The above application has been filed jointly by the applicant and
complainants – Ram Prasad Singh and Lakheshwar Prasad Tiwari, who
appeared through Video Conferencing provided by the District Legal Services
Authority, Surajpur. They are identified by the counsel Shri Aman Upadhyay.
3. This revision has been preferred by the applicant against the judgment dated
29.03.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No.17/2015 by the Additional Sessions
Judge, Pratappur whereby the applicant was convicted under Section 420 of
2
IPC and sentenced to RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.300/- and in default
thereof, further RI for one month (two times).
4. In this application I.A. No.2/2025, it is mentioned by the complainants that
they have settled the dispute amicably and further submit that they entered
the compromise voluntarily and on their own will with the applicant and that
there is no pressure or fear from any third party. In support of this
application, affidavits have been filed by both the complainants. On being
asked, complainants submit that without any fear or pressure, they are
voluntarily compounding the case. This application also bears the signature
of the complainants and that of the applicant/revisionist.
5. Thus, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and further
considering the fact that under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C. the offence under
Section 420 of IPC is compoundable and also keeping in view the above, the
application (I.A. No.2/2025) filed under Section 320 IPC/Section 316(4) of
B.N.S.S. is allowed and the permission to compromise the matter with the
applicant is granted to the complainants.
6. On the basis of compromise and in view of Section 320 (8) of Cr.P.C., the
applicant is acquitted of the offence under Section 420 of IPC. Since the
applicant is reported to be on bail, therefore, his bail bonds shall remain in
force for a period of six months from today in view of provision of Section
437-A of Cr.P.C.
7. In view of what has been stated above, the revision stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE
Anjani