Daitary Behera vs State Of Odisha …. Opposite Party on 26 June, 2025

0
1

-B/34 IPC.

3. Admittedly though the Petitioner was a named
accused in the FIR but while filing the charge sheet,
he was not cited as an accused. Assailing the same,
the Informant-injured approached this Court by filing
CRLMP No.485 of 2024 under Articles 226 and 227 of
the Constitution of India seeking a direction for
further investigation in Kodala P.S. Case by any other
investigating agency or by CBI. Such contention was
opposed by the learned counsel for the State.

Considering the submissions and the materials
on record, this Court directed for further investigation
into the involvement of the present Petitioner. While
so directing, this Court also observed that such
direction ought not to be construed as this Court
expressing any opinion regarding complicity of the
Petitioner. Paragraph-9 of the order of this Court
directing for further investigation regarding role
played by the present Petitioner in the conspiracy
which resulted in the gruesome murder of Sunil @
Judhisthir Nahak is extracted hereunder for
convenience of reference:



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here