Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Delhi Develoment Authority vs Mahender Singh on 8 January, 2025
Bench: Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/ INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025
(@ D.NO.21786/2023)
IN
Civil Appeal No. 8648 of 2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICANT(S)
VERSUS
MEHBOOB & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025
(@ D.NO.402/2023)
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(S). @ D.No. 27346 OF 2019
IN
Civil Appeal No. 8639 of 2016
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Learned senior counsel / counsel for the parties are ad idem
that the issue involved in the instant case squarely falls within
Signature Not Verified
the ambit of our decision in Government of NCT of Delhi through its
Digitally signed by
KAPIL TANDON
Date: 2025.01.21
13:41:49 IST
Reason:
Secretary, Land and Building Department & another vs. K.L. Rathi
1
Steels Limited and others, (2024) 7 SCC 315.
3. Consequently, the respondent(s)-land owner(s) are held
entitled to compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement
Act, 2013 in accordance with the procedure as explained in
paragraph 128 of K.L. Rathi (supra), which reads as follows:
128. Under the circumstances, dismissal of the
RPs and miscellaneous applications would have
been logical and we could have ended our judgment
here by ordering so. However, there is something
more of a balancing act that needs to be done
having regard to the disclosures that were made
in course of progress of other proceedings before
us, which followed immediately after judgment on
this set of RPs and miscellaneous applications
was reserved. Such other proceedings arose out of
appeals carried from orders of the High Court
declaring land acquisition proceedings as lapsed
based on the decision in Pune Municipal
Corporation (supra) as distinguished from RPs and
miscellaneous applications of the nature under
consideration. Since all such proceedings have
more or less a common genesis and have followed
similar trajectory, it would be eminently
desirable to find a solution that benefits all.
We may hasten to add here that the exercise of
inherent powers conferred on this Court by
Article 142, in such circumstances, is not just
inevitable but also pivotal for disposal of the
matters at hand, given their impact on public
interest at large as well as to secure uniformity
and consistency in our decisions; hence, we
consider it expedient to pass such orders or
directions for ensuring complete justice in the
matters under consideration before us.
Notwithstanding our discussion on the reference
which was necessitated to answer the question of
law on which there was a disagreement between the
Hon’ble Judges of the Division Bench, taking an
overall and holistic view of the matter and in
the light of the larger public interest that is
involved, in each of the RPs and miscellaneous
applications that have been dealt with by this
judgment (except those remanded to the High Court
and those de-tagged for separate listing infra),
we issue the following directions:
2
a) The time limit for initiation of fresh
acquisition proceedings in terms of the
provisions contained in section 24(2) of the
2013 Act is extended by a year starting from
01st August, 2024 whereupon compensation to
the affected landowners may be paid in
accordance with law, failing which
consequences, also as per law, shall follow;
b) The parties shall maintain status quo
regarding possession, change of land use and
creation of third-party rights till fresh
acquisition proceedings, as directed above,
are completed;
c) Since the landowners are not primarily
dependent upon the subject lands as their
source of sustenance and most of these lands
were/are under use for other than
agricultural purposes, we deem it appropriate
to invoke our powers under Article 142 of the
Constitution and dispense with the compliance
of Chapters II and III of the 2013 Act
whereunder it is essential to prepare a
Social Impact Assessment Study Report and/or
to develop alternative multi-crop irrigated
agricultural land. We do so to ensure that
the timeline of one year extended at (a)
above to complete the acquisition process can
be adhered to by the appellants and the
GNCTD, which would also likely be beneficial
to the expropriated landowners;
d) Similarly, compliance with sections 13, 14,
16 to 20 of the 2013 Act can be dispensed
with as the subject-lands are predominantly
urban/semi-urban in nature and had earlier
been acquired for public purposes of
paramount importance. In order to simplify
the compliance of direction at (a) above, it
is further directed that every Notification
issued under section 4(1) of the 1894 Act in
this batch of cases, shall be treated as a
Preliminary Notification within the meaning
of section 11 of the 2013 Act, and shall be
deemed to have been published as on 01st
January, 2014;
e) The Collector shall provide hearing of
objections as per section 15 of the 2013 Act
without insisting for any Social Impact
Assessment Report and shall, thereafter,
proceed to take necessary steps as per the
procedure contemplated under section 21
onwards of Chapter-IV of 2013 Act, save and
except where compliance of any provision has
3
been expressly or impliedly dispensed with;
f) The landowners may submit their objections
within a period of four weeks from the date
of pronouncement of this order. Such
objections shall not question the legality of
the acquisition process and shall be limited
only to clauses (a) and (b) of section 15(1)
of the 2013 Act;
g) The Collector shall publish a public notice
on his website and in one English and one
vernacular newspapers, within two weeks of
expiry of the period of four weeks granted
under direction (f) above;
h) The Collector shall, thereafter, pass an
award as early as possible but not exceeding
six months, regardless of the maximum period
of twelve months contemplated under section
25 of the 2013 Act. The market value of the
land shall be assessed as on 01st January,
2014 and the compensation shall be awarded
along with all other monetary benefits in
accordance with the provisions of the 2013
Act except the claim like rehabilitation
etc.;
i) The Collector shall consider all the
parameters prescribed under section 28 of the
2013 Act for determining the compensation for
the acquired land. Similarly, the Collector
shall determine the market value of the
building or assets attached with the land in
accordance with section 29 and shall further
award solatium in accordance with section 30
of the 2013 Act;
j) In the peculiar facts and circumstances of
this case, since it is difficult to reverse
the clock back, the compliance of Chapter (V)
pertaining to “Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Award” is hereby dispensed with;
and
k) The expropriated landowners shall be entitled
to seek reference for enhancement of
compensation in accordance with Chapter-VIII
of the 2013 Act.
4. It is clarified that the extension of one year, as granted to
the Authorities for completion of acquisition in sub-para (a)
reproduced above, will commence from the date of this order.
4
5. The Miscellaneous Applications are, accordingly, disposed of.
6. As a result, pending interlocutory applications, if any, also
stand disposed of.
…………………J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
…………………J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025
5
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/ INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025
(@ D.NO.34776/2023)
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(S)……@ D.NO. 41760 OF 2018
IN
Civil Appeal No. 8624 of 2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICANT(S)
VERSUS
TEJPAL SINGH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025
(@ D.NO. 34835/2023)
IN
Civil Appeal No. 8624 of 2016
O R D E R
1. Learned counsel for the private respondent(s) has brought on
record a photostat copy of the registered sale deed executed on
31.08.1961, whereunder Dharam Singh and Sanwaliya, sons of
Bhaktawar Singh, residents of Sultanpur, Delhi, sold complete
Khasra No. 191 and 192 of Sultanpur village in favour of Joginder
Singh and other named persons. It is stated that Mr. Joginder Singh
was the father of the private respondents.
2. That being so, the instant case(s) squarely falls within the
ambit of our decision in Government of NCT of Delhi through its
6
Secretary, Land and Building Department & another vs. K.L. Rathi
Steels Limited and others, (2024) 7 SCC 315.
3. Consequently, the respondent(s)-land owner(s) are held
entitled to compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement
Act, 2013 in accordance with the procedure as explained in
paragraph 128 of K.L. Rathi (supra), which reads as follows:
128. Under the circumstances, dismissal of the
RPs and miscellaneous applications would have
been logical and we could have ended our judgment
here by ordering so. However, there is something
more of a balancing act that needs to be done
having regard to the disclosures that were made
in course of progress of other proceedings before
us, which followed immediately after judgment on
this set of RPs and miscellaneous applications
was reserved. Such other proceedings arose out of
appeals carried from orders of the High Court
declaring land acquisition proceedings as lapsed
based on the decision in Pune Municipal
Corporation (supra) as distinguished from RPs and
miscellaneous applications of the nature under
consideration. Since all such proceedings have
more or less a common genesis and have followed
similar trajectory, it would be eminently
desirable to find a solution that benefits all.
We may hasten to add here that the exercise of
inherent powers conferred on this Court by
Article 142, in such circumstances, is not just
inevitable but also pivotal for disposal of the
matters at hand, given their impact on public
interest at large as well as to secure uniformity
and consistency in our decisions; hence, we
consider it expedient to pass such orders or
directions for ensuring complete justice in the
matters under consideration before us.
Notwithstanding our discussion on the reference
which was necessitated to answer the question of
law on which there was a disagreement between the
Hon’ble Judges of the Division Bench, taking an
overall and holistic view of the matter and in
the light of the larger public interest that is
involved, in each of the RPs and miscellaneous
applications that have been dealt with by this
judgment (except those remanded to the High Court
and those de-tagged for separate listing infra),
7
we issue the following directions:
a) The time limit for initiation of fresh
acquisition proceedings in terms of the
provisions contained in section 24(2) of the
2013 Act is extended by a year starting from
01st August, 2024 whereupon compensation to
the affected landowners may be paid in
accordance with law, failing which
consequences, also as per law, shall follow;
b) The parties shall maintain status quo
regarding possession, change of land use and
creation of third-party rights till fresh
acquisition proceedings, as directed above,
are completed;
c) Since the landowners are not primarily
dependent upon the subject lands as their
source of sustenance and most of these lands
were/are under use for other than
agricultural purposes, we deem it appropriate
to invoke our powers under Article 142 of the
Constitution and dispense with the compliance
of Chapters II and III of the 2013 Act
whereunder it is essential to prepare a
Social Impact Assessment Study Report and/or
to develop alternative multi-crop irrigated
agricultural land. We do so to ensure that
the timeline of one year extended at (a)
above to complete the acquisition process can
be adhered to by the appellants and the
GNCTD, which would also likely be beneficial
to the expropriated landowners;
d) Similarly, compliance with sections 13, 14,
16 to 20 of the 2013 Act can be dispensed
with as the subject-lands are predominantly
urban/semi-urban in nature and had earlier
been acquired for public purposes of
paramount importance. In order to simplify
the compliance of direction at (a) above, it
is further directed that every Notification
issued under section 4(1) of the 1894 Act in
this batch of cases, shall be treated as a
Preliminary Notification within the meaning
of section 11 of the 2013 Act, and shall be
deemed to have been published as on 01st
January, 2014;
e) The Collector shall provide hearing of
objections as per section 15 of the 2013 Act
without insisting for any Social Impact
Assessment Report and shall, thereafter,
proceed to take necessary steps as per the
procedure contemplated under section 21
8
onwards of Chapter-IV of 2013 Act, save and
except where compliance of any provision has
been expressly or impliedly dispensed with;
f) The landowners may submit their objections
within a period of four weeks from the date
of pronouncement of this order. Such
objections shall not question the legality of
the acquisition process and shall be limited
only to clauses (a) and (b) of section 15(1)
of the 2013 Act;
g) The Collector shall publish a public notice
on his website and in one English and one
vernacular newspapers, within two weeks of
expiry of the period of four weeks granted
under direction (f) above;
h) The Collector shall, thereafter, pass an
award as early as possible but not exceeding
six months, regardless of the maximum period
of twelve months contemplated under section
25 of the 2013 Act. The market value of the
land shall be assessed as on 01st January,
2014 and the compensation shall be awarded
along with all other monetary benefits in
accordance with the provisions of the 2013
Act except the claim like rehabilitation
etc.;
i) The Collector shall consider all the
parameters prescribed under section 28 of the
2013 Act for determining the compensation for
the acquired land. Similarly, the Collector
shall determine the market value of the
building or assets attached with the land in
accordance with section 29 and shall further
award solatium in accordance with section 30
of the 2013 Act;
j) In the peculiar facts and circumstances of
this case, since it is difficult to reverse
the clock back, the compliance of Chapter (V)
pertaining to “Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Award” is hereby dispensed with;
and
k) The expropriated landowners shall be entitled
to seek reference for enhancement of
compensation in accordance with Chapter-VIII
of the 2013 Act.
4. It is clarified that the extension of one year, as granted to
the Authorities for completion of acquisition in sub-para (a)
reproduced above, will commence from the date of this order.
9
5. The Miscellaneous Applications are, accordingly, disposed of.
6. As a result, pending interlocutory applications, if any, also
stand disposed of.
…………………J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
…………………J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025
10
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2025
[@ DIARY NO.40773/2022]
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6230 OF 2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICANT(S)
VERSUS
VEERA SINGH & OTHERS RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF 2025
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(S). OF 2025)
(@ DIARY NO. 28063 OF 2022)
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025
(@ D.NO. 40963/2022)
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s)……..@ D.NO. 5204 OF 2020
IN
Civil Appeal No. 6230 of 2017
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The parties are common in all these matters. The acquired land
is admittedly claimed to have been purchased by the private
respondents through various modes like agreement to sell, General
11
Power of Attorney, and sale deed, executed much after the issuance
of Section 4 notification dated 05.11.1980 and 6 notification dated
21.05.1985 for its acquisition. In this light and keeping in view
the multiple issues involved, which require fresh adjudication by
the High Court, the instant case(s) ought to be remanded to the High
Court.
4. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Application(s) for recalling of
order(s), as also Review Petition are allowed, and order dated
04.05.2017 is recalled. Civil Appeal No. 6230 of 2017 is restored to
its original number.
Civil Appeal Nos. 6230/2017 and ………………/2025 (arising out of SLP (C)
No(s). of 2025 @ Diary No. 28063/2022)
5. It is clear that these matters fall within the category of
cases remanded to the High Court in Group E of the three Judge Bench
decision of this Court in Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. BSK
Realtors LLP & Anr., reported in (2024) 7 SCC 370.
6. Accordingly, the civil appeals are partly allowed, the impugned
order dated 08.02.2016 is set aside, WP(C)No.8526/2014, filed before
the High Court of Delhi, is restored, and the matter is remitted to
the High Court to determine the dispute in accordance with law.
7. The parties are, accordingly, directed to appear before the
High Court on 24.02.2025.
8. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the
merits of the case(s), and it goes without saying that all
contentions are left open for being raised and contested before the
12
High Court.
9. As a result, the pending interlocutory applications, if any,
also stand disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025
13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025
(@ D.NO. 40951/2022)
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(S)…….@ D.NO. 13945 OF 2019
IN
Civil Appeal No. 6149 of 2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICANT(S)
VERSUS
ABHISHEK JAIN & OTHERS RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that in view of the
multiple issues involved, which require fresh adjudication by the
High Court, the instant case may be remanded to the High Court.
3. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Application for recalling of
order, as also the Review Petition are allowed, and order dated
04.05.2017 is recalled. Civil Appeal No. 6149/2017 is restored to
its original number.
Civil Appeal No. 6149/2017
4. It is clear that this matter falls within the category of cases
remanded to the High Court in Group E of the three Judge Bench
decision of this Court in Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. BSK
Realtors LLP & Anr., reported in (2024) 7 SCC 370.
5. Accordingly, the civil appeal is partly allowed, the impugned
order dated 09.02.2015 is set aside, WP(C)No.8593/2014, filed
14
before the High Court of Delhi, is restored, and the matter is
remitted to the High Court to determine the dispute in accordance
with law.
6. The parties are, accordingly, directed to appear before the
High Court on 24.02.2025.
7. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the
merits of the case, and it goes without saying that all contentions
are left open for being raised and contested before the High Court.
8. As a result, the pending interlocutory applications, if any,
also stand disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025
15
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2025
(DIARY NO.42177/2022)
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6182/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICANT/APPELLANT
VERSUS
FLASH PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Civil Appeal No. 6640/2024, titled ‘Land Acquisition
Collector (South) vs. M/s Flash Properties Private Limited and
others’ stands partly allowed vide judgment dated 17.05.2024,
reported as ‘Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. BSK Realtors LLP &
Anr., reported in (2024) 7 SCC 370, wherein, as Item 22 in Group
E of the judgment, the impugned judgment was set aside and the
matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh adjudication.
3. In view of the fact that the impugned judgment has already
been set aside, and the matter is before the High Court, the
instant Miscellaneous Application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
16
4. As a result, the pending interlocutory application, if any,
also stands disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025
PS
17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2025
(DIARY NO.446/2023)
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6262/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
ANSAR AHMED AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that, in view
of the multiple issues involved, which require fresh
adjudication by the High Court, this case may be remanded to
the High Court.
3. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Application for recalling
of order is allowed, and order dated 04.05.2017 in Civil Appeal
No. 6262/2017 is recalled. Civil Appeal No. 6262/2017 is
restored to its original number.
Civil Appeal No. 6262/2017
4. It is clear that this matter falls within the category of
cases remanded to the High Court in Group E of the three Judge
Bench decision of this Court in Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
vs. BSK Realtors LLP & Anr., reported in (2024) 7 SCC 370.
5. Accordingly, the civil appeal is partly allowed, the
impugned order dated 08.03.2016 is set aside,
18
WP(C)No.5270/2015, filed before the High Court of Delhi, is
restored, and the matter is remitted to the High Court to
determine the dispute in accordance with law.
6. The parties are, accordingly, directed to appear before
the High Court on 24.02.2025.
7. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on
the merits of the case, and it goes without saying that all
contentions are left open for being raised and contested before
the High Court.
8. As a result, the pending interlocutory application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025
PS
19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2025
(DIARY NO. 1001/2023)
IN
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) D.NO.23340/2018
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12110/2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
URMIL MAKKER AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2025)
(DIARY NO. 12327/2023)
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1508 OF 2018
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12110 OF 2016
AND
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 463 OF 2019
IN
MA 383/2018
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12110 OF 2016
20
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted in SLP @ Diary No. 12327/2023.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the Delhi Development
Authority (DDA) states that the present matters pertain
to common land, which was utilized for public purposes,
without being formally acquired. Consequently, in order
to put a quietus to the dispute, the Ministry of Housing
and Urban Affairs had given an undertaking before this
Court on 24.09.2018 in MA No. 383/2018 (which was filed
by the DDA), for payment of compensation to the land
owners in accordance with the provisions of the Right to
Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Therefore, a
sum of ₹7,86,48,000/- has been deposited in the Registry
of this Court, as was directed by this Court vide order
dated 07.09.2022 in Contempt Petition (C) No. 1508/2018.
4. Accordingly, these matters are disposed of with a
direction to the Registry to transfer the aforesaid
amount, along with interest accrued thereupon, to the
Reference Court within two weeks, who in turn is directed
to release the same in favour of the land owners within
three weeks after verifying their share and identity.
5. If the landowners are entitled to raise a claim for
further enhancement of the compensation, they shall be at
21
liberty to do so, in accordance with law, and subject to
the objection(s) that may be taken by the applicants. It
is clarified that the objection of limitation in seeking
enhancement of compensation shall not be entertained, if
they raise the claim under law within a period of thirty
days from today.
6. Pending application(s), if any, are disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
JANUARY 08, 2025.
PS
22
ITEM NO.6+7.7+8.6+13.8+8.19+68 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV-A,XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 42745/2022
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-05-2017
in C.A. No. No. 6187/2017 passed by the Supreme Court of India]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MAHENDER SINGH . & ANR. Respondent(s)
IA No. 59442/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 205357/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
WITH
Diary No(s). 12635/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 61947/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 61944/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12639/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 61957/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 61958/2023
IA No. 61958/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 61957/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 21786/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 107603/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 107604/2023
IA No. 107604/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 107603/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 23142/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 112726/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 112727/2023
IA No. 112727/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 112726/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 34776/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 170912/2023
IA No. 170912/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 34835/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 170530/2023)
Diary No(s). 38181/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 189440/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 189444/2023
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 189445/2023
IA No. 189444/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
23
IA No. 189445/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 189440/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 40773/2022 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 196358/2022
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 196363/2022
IA No. 196363/2022 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 196358/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 40951/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 197171/2022 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 197166/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 42177/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 55189/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 202497/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 402/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 1057/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 138916/2023
IA No. 138916/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 1057/2023 – MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER)
Diary No(s). 446/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 1444/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1447/2023
IA No. 1447/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 1444/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 674/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 2465/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 2468/2023
IA No. 2468/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 2465/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1001/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 4214/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 4217/2023
IA No. 4217/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 4214/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1464/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6695/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6697/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 6693/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1465/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6703/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6709/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 6701/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1466/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6704/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6705/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 6702/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
24
Diary No(s). 4091/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 20072/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 20073/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 20071/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 4990/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 24828/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 24831/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 24827/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 5711/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 28698/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 28701/2023
IA No. 28701/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 28698/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 6523/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 33041/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33043/2023
IA No. 33043/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 33041/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 6524/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 33039/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33042/2023
IA No. 33042/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 33039/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 11767/2023 (XIV-A)
(IA No. 57785/2023- Application for Condonation of delay in filing
M.A.
IA No. 57784/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER
IA No. 57785/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12978/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 64709/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 64708/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 13420/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 131237/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 66347/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 14584/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 71274/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 71275/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 14601/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 71310/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 71308/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 21344/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 105101/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 105106/2023
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 105108/2023
25
IA No. 105106/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 105108/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 105101/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 22524/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 110340/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 110338/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 27415/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 166957/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 166958/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING PAPER BOOKS
IA No. 130925/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 33298/2023 (XIV-A)
FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 162108/2023
FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 153912/2024
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 175628/2024
IA No. 153912/2024 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 175628/2024 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 162108/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 7295/2024 (XIV-A)
IA No. 40166/2024 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 40160/2024 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 28063/2022 (XIV)
(FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA
173573/2023
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 173574/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 173575/2023
IA No. 173575/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 173573/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE
DEFECTS
IA No. 173574/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Diary No(s). 20119/2023 (XIV)
(IA No. 107594/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 107595/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT)
Diary No(s). 40963/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 197225/2022 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 197222/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
ITEM 8.19
DIARY NO(S). 12327/2023 (XIV)
(IA No. 173388/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING, IA No.
173390/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE
DEFECTS)
ITEM 68
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 1508/2018 IN C.A. NO. 12110/2016
(IA No. 55450/2019 – APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION, IA No. 19968/2019
26
– CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION, IA No. 55451/2019 – MODIFICATION, IA
No. 195497/2022 – MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER, IA No. 158564/2022
– MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER)
ITEM 68.1
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 463/2019 in MA 383/2018 in C.A. No. 12110/2016
(XIV-A)
Date : 08-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
For Parties Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, AOR
Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR
Mr. Ritwik Parikh, Adv.
Mr. Satwik Parikh, Adv.
Ms. Kritika, Adv.
Mr. Rajat K. Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Srivastava, Adv.
Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AOR
Ms. Sunieta Ojha, AOR
Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR
M/S. Saharya & Co., AOR
Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, AOR
Mr. Arpit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Himaghn Jain, Adv.
Ms. Sonakshi Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Mihir Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Mitali Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Shitij, Adv.
Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR
Mr. Shubham Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Saksham Kaushik, Adv.
Mr. Govind, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Kashyap, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Manika Tripathy, AOR
27
Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Malvika Kapila, AOR
Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Harbani Shinh, Adv.
Ms. Shalu Sharma, AOR
Mr. T. L. Garg, AOR
Mr. Rajender Pd. Saxena, AOR
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Saxena, Adv.
Mr. N.p. Sahni, Adv.
Mr. Vineet Sinha, Adv.
Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR
Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Adv.
Ms. Sanjna Dua, Adv.
Ms. Namrata Langade, Adv.
M/S. Dua Associates, AOR
Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR
M/S. Vedya Partners Aor, AOR
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Bharat Arora, Adv.
Mr. Lakshay Raheja, Adv.
Mr. Gourav Arora, Adv.
Mr. Manikya Khanna, Adv.
Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, A.S.G.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mrs. Sunita Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Adv.
Mr. Anukalp Jain, Adv.
Mr. A K Kaul, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. A K Panda, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR
Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv.
Ms. Kusum Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Vikas Kumar, AOR
Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR
Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR
Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv.
Mr. Vedant Bharadwaj, Adv.
28
Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR
Mr. D.M.sharma, Adv.
Ms. Surbhi Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Iti Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR
Mr. Abhieshumat Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR
Ms. Charu Ambwani, AOR
Ms. Neeru Vaid, AOR
Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Adv.
Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR
Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Adv.
Mr. Sachin Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, AOR
Ms. Smita Maan, AOR
Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv.
Mr. Satya Darshi Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. B.k. Satija, Adv.
Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Samta Pushkarna Mishra, Adv.
Mr. C.k. Sharma, Adv.
Mr. C.K. Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Adarsh Kr. Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Manish, Adv.
Mr. Vishnu Kant, Adv.
Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR
Mr. Rachita Kadyan, Adv.
Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR
Ms. Rachita Kadyan, Adv.
Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv.
Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Avs Kadyan, Adv.
Mr. Sudipta Singha Roy, Adv.
Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Vb Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Himanshu Raj, Adv.
Mr. Tara Chauhan, Adv.
Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, AOR
Ms. Prachi Bajpai, AOR
Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR
29
Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv.
Mr. C.p. Rajwar, Adv.
Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Adv.
Dr. V.B. Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Amitabh Kumar Verma, Adv.
Ms. Muskan Bhagat, Adv.
Mr. Babu Malayil, Adv.
Mr. B.l.shivhare, Adv.
Mr. Sher Singh, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR
Mr. Alok K. Prasad, Adv.
Mr. S K Rout, Adv.
Mr. Ganesh Singh, Adv.
Mr. Amit Acharya, Adv.
Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Adv.
Mr. Priyonkoo Anjan Gogoi, Adv.
Ms. Priti, Adv.
Mr. Prithvi Pal, AOR
Ms. Smita Maan, AOR
Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv.
Mr. Kartik Dabas, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR
Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Nandita Mishra
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Manika Tripathy, AOR
Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Adv.
Mr. Barun Dey, Adv.
Mr. Sumit Bansal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Utsav Garg, Adv.
Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, AOR
Mr. Aditya Bakshi, Adv.
Mr. Uddaibir Singh Kochar, Adv.
Mr. Sudharshan Lamba, AOR
Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Aniket Seth, Adv.
Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv.
Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
30
O R D E R
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 42745/2022 (Item no. 6)
1. As per Office Report dated 06.01.2025, learned counsel for the
applicant has not filed spare copies, due to which show cause
notice could not be issued.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant shall do the needful within
two days.
3. Issue fresh notice returnable on 22.01.2025.
4. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
Diary No. 12635 of 2023 (Item no. 6.1), Diary No. 12639 of 2023
(Item No. 6.2) and Diary No. 20119 of 2023 (Item No. 8.6)
5. Learned senior counsel for the Delhi Development Authority
undertakes to furnish the details of previous Court cases alleged
to have filed by the father-in-law of the respondent, i.e., Mr. Ram
Labhaya, his family members, or Ruchi Vihar Housing Welfare Society
which was statedly constituted by Mr. Ram Labhaya and his family.
6. Post the matters on 22.01.2025.
Diary No. 23142 of 2023 (Item no. 6.4)
7. Respondent No. 5 is represented by Mr. N.Visakamurthy, learned
AOR. It is reported that two other private respondents have passed
away. Let the legal representatives be brought on record within one
week by filing the necessary application. Upon such application
being made, let notice be issued to the proposed legal
representatives and service of notice be effected upon them through
dasti. The other unserved respondents shall also be served through
dasti.
8. List on 22.01.2025.
31
Diary No. 38181 of 2023 (Item No.6.7)
9. This matter is wrongly listed as it has already been disposed
of vide our order dated 11.12.2024.
M.A. Diary no. 674/2023 (Item No. 6.13)
10. The Revenue Records produced before us reveal that Narender
Kumar filed the writ petition before the High Court through General
Power of Attorney (GPA) – Anil Gupta. The copy of the GPA has also
been appended with the writ petition, through which, the subject
land has been, in a way, entrusted to Anil Gupta and his
associates. The revenue entries relied upon in the writ petition
also indicate such transfer of right.
11. Learned counsel for the landowner, however, disputes this
objection raised on behalf of the writ petitioner.
12. Let the affidavit of the original owner Narender Kumar, S/o
Munni Lal, along with all the requisite documents, to show that he
is the owner in continuous possession of the subject land, be
placed on record.
13. The documents relied upon for sanction of mutation be also
appended with the affidavit.
14. Post this matter on 22.01.2025.
Miscellaneous Application No. of 2025(@ D.NO.21786/2023) in
Civil Appeal No. 8648 of 2016, Miscellaneous Application No.
of 2025(@ D.NO.402/2023) in Review Petition (c) No(S). @ D.No.
27346 OF 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 8639 of 2016 (Item nos. 6.3 and
6.11)
15. Delay condoned.
16. The Miscellaneous Applications are disposed of in terms
of the Signed Order.
17. As a result, the pending interlocutory application(s), if any,
also stands disposed of.
32
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. of 2025(@ D.NO.34776 of 2023) in
Review Petition (C) No(s)……@ D.No. 41760 Of 2018 in Civil Appeal
No. 8624 Of 2016, Miscellaneous Application No. of 2025(@
D.NO. 34835/2023) in Civil Appeal No. 8624 of 2016 (Item nos. 6.5
and 6.6)
18. The Miscellaneous Applications are disposed of in terms
of the Signed Order.
19. As a result, the pending interlocutory application(s), if any,
also stands disposed of.
Miscellaneous Application No. Of 2025[@ Diary No.40773 Of
2022],Civil Appeal No(S)…. Of 2025 @ SLP (C) No(S). Of…. 2025 @
Diary No. 28063 Of 2022, Miscellaneous Application No. Of 2025 @
D.No. 40963/2022 (Item Nos. 6.8, 7.7 and 13.8)
20. Delay condoned.
21. Leave granted.
22. The Miscellaneous Application(s) for recalling of order(s), as
also Review Petition are allowed, and order dated 04.05.2017 is
recalled. Civil Appeal No. 6230 of 2017 is restored to its original
number.
23. The civil appeals are partly allowed in terms of the Signed
Order.
24. As a result, the pending interlocutory application(s), if any,
also stands disposed of.
Miscellaneous Application No. Of 2025(@ D.No. 40951 Of 2022)
in Review Petition (c) No(S)…….@ D.No. 13945 Of 2019 in Civil
Appeal No. 6149 Of 2017 (Item No. 6.9)
25. Delay condoned.
26. The Miscellaneous Application(s) for recalling of order, as
also the Review Petition are allowed, and order dated 04.05.2017 is
recalled. Civil Appeal No. 6149/2017 is restored to its original
number.
33
27. The civil appeal is partly allowed in terms of the Signed
Order.
28. As a result, the pending interlocutory application(s), if any,
also stands disposed of.
DIARY NO(S). 42177/2022 (Item no. 6.10)
29. Delay condoned.
30. Miscellaneous Application is dismissed as having become
infructuous in terms of the signed order.
31. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
DIARY NO(S). 446/2023 (Item No. 6.12)
32. Delay condoned.
33. Miscellaneous application is allowed. Civil Appeal
No.6262/2017 is restored to its original number.
34. Civil Appeal No.6262/2017 is partly allowed in terms of the
signed order. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
DIARY NO. 1001/2023, DIARY NO. 12327/2023, CONMT.PET.(C) NO.
1508/2018 IN C.A. NO. 12110/2016 & CONMT.PET.(C) No. 463/2019 in MA
383/2018 in C.A. No. 12110/2016: (Item 6.14,8.19,68,68.1)
35. Delay condoned.
36. Leave granted in SLP@ Diary No. 12327/2023.
37. These matters are disposed of in terms of the signed order.
38. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
Rest of the matters
39. List on 22.01.2025.
(KAPIL TANDON) (POOJA SHARMA) (PREETHI T.C.)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
34
(Signed orders in Miscellaneous Application No…..of 2025(@
D.NO.21786 of 2023) in Civil Appeal No. 8648 of 2016, Miscellaneous
Application No. of 2025(@ D.NO.402/2023) in Review Petition
(c) No(S). @ D.No. 27346 OF 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 8639 of
2016 , Miscellaneous Application No. of 2025(@ D.NO.34776 of
2023) in Review Petition (C) No(s)……@ D.No. 41760 Of 2018 in
Civil Appeal No. 8624 Of 2016, Miscellaneous Application No.
of 2025(@ D.NO. 34835/2023) in Civil Appeal No. 8624 of 2016,
Miscellaneous Application No. Of 2025[@ Diary No.40773 Of
2022],Civil Appeal No(S)…. Of 2025 @ SLP (C) No(S). Of…. 2025 @
Diary No. 28063 Of 2022, Miscellaneous Application No. Of 2025 @
D.No. 40963 of 2022 in Review Petition (C) Nos. ….@ D.No. 5204
of 2020 in Civil Appeal No. 6230 of 2017, Miscellaneous Application
No. Of 2025(@ D.No. 40951 Of 2022) in Review Petition (c)
No(S)…….@ D.No. 13945 Of 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 6149 Of
2017,DIARY NO(S). 42177/2022, DIARY NO(S). 446/2023,DIARY NO.
1001/2023, DIARY NO. 12327/2023, CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 1508/2018 IN
C.A. NO. 12110/2016 & CONMT.PET.(C) No. 463/2019 in MA 383/2018 in
C.A. No. 12110/2016 are placed on the file)
35
[ad_1]
Source link