[ad_1]
Jharkhand High Court
Deshratna @ Deshratan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 17 April, 2025
Author: Ananda Sen
Bench: Ananda Sen
2025:JHHC:11674
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.3358 of 2024
------
Deshratna @ Deshratan, aged about 36 years, Son of Ajay
Singh, Resident of Triveni Apartments, Jay Prakash Nagar, PO,
PS & District Dhanbad. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Md. Amir Khan, aged about 34 years, S/o Md. Irfan Khan,
aged about 34 years, Resident of 117, Block No.507,
Rangatand, Railway Colony, PO, PS & District Dhanbad.
... ... Opposite Parties
With
A.B.A. No.2202 of 2024
------
Ashutosh Singh, aged about 34 years, Son of Ajay Singh,
Resident of Triveni Apartments, Jay Prakash Nagar, PO, PS &
District Dhanbad. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Md. Amir Khan, aged about 34 years, S/o Md. Irfan Khan,
aged about 34 years, Resident of 117, Block No.507,
Rangatand, Railway Colony, PO, PS & District Dhanbad.
... ... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
——
For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Akriti Shree, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P.
[in ABA No.3358/2024]
Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.
[in ABA No.2202/2024]
For the OP No.2 : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
—–
09/ 17.04.2025
Heard the parties.
2. These anticipatory bail applications under Sections 438
and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, have been
preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for
offences registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471,
447(A), 120B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned senior counsel representing the opposite party
no.2 opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail in those cases.
4. From the impugned order and FIR, I find that the
1
2025:JHHC:11674
petitioner and informant entered into partnership and the deed
was prepared. The business continued and thereafter some
dispute arose between them. It is alleged that the
remuneration of the informant to the tune of Rs.2.50 lacs and
Rs.10 lacs in shares has not been paid and the investments
were being diverted.
5. From the aforesaid allegation, I am of the opinion that the
entire dispute revolves around partnership firm and it is the
dispute between the partners.
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, these Anticipatory Bail
Applications stand allowed. The petitioners, above named, are
directed to surrender before the learned court below within four
weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on the
event of their surrender or arrest, they shall be released on bail
on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the
satisfaction of learned Court of CJM, Dhanbad, in connection
with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.420 of 2023, subject to the
condition that one of the bailers should be a close relative of
the petitioners and other should be a resident of State of
Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in their name or in
the name of their ancestors in which they are having share and
to that effect, they have to file an affidavit before the Trial
Court indicating their share in the property.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
RKM/
2
[ad_2]
Source link