Jharkhand High Court
Dilip Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 11 April, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary
[2025:JHHC:11197]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.2301 of 2025
------
Dilip Kumar Gupta, aged about 40 years, S/o-Prabhu Ram Gupta, R/o-
124, Near Bajrangbali Temple, P.O. Shikharjee & P.S.-Madhuban, Dist.-
Giridih, Jharkhand
…. …. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Opposite Party
——
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
——
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate
For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay, Addl. P.P
For the Informant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No.02 Dated- 11-04-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih Town P.S. Case
No.117 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 420,
467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of I.P.C, the petitioner has moved this Court for
grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner being the power of
attorney holder, with the co-accused persons has executed the sale deed in
exercise of power conferred upon him by set of the co-accused persons in
favour of another set of co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the
allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that in
respect of the property, the ownership which is claimed by the
Terahpanthi Koti, Madhuban; a civil suit is pending. It is then submitted
that there is no allegation against the petitioner of cheating or inducing
delivery of any property. It is further submitted that the petitioner
undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the Terahpanthi Koti,
Madhuban in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly
submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the
investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash
security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges
of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed
to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the
event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on
depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Giridih in connection with Giridih
Town P.S. Case No.117 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate
with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating
officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile numbers
and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that he will
not change his mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and he
will not annoy or disturb the Terahpanthi Koti, Madhuban in any
manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid
down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Rohit/