Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Dilip Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:13776) on 10 March, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:13776]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 3044/2025
Dilip Singh S/o Dhan Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dheera,
Police Station Siwana, District Balotra. (Presently Lodged In Sub
Jail Bhinmal)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rawal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, DyGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
10/03/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 483 of the BNSS at the
instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 15/2024 2. Concerned Police Station Bhinmal 3. District Jalore 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Section 341, 323, 325, 394, 397, 307 and 427 of the IPC 5. Offences added, if any - 6. Date of passing of impugned order 04.03.2025
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that co-
accused Manohar Singh has been granted bail by this court
and the case of the petitioner stands on identical footing. It
(Downloaded on 13/03/2025 at 09:44:44 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:13776] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3044/2025]
is further submitted that no case for the alleged offences is
made out against him and he has been made an accused
based on conjectures and surmises. His incarceration is not
warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand
that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record. The
similarly situated co-accused Manohar Singh been enlarged
on bail by this court vide order dated 16.05.2024 and the
case of the petitioner is not distinguishable. There is high
probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In
light of these facts and circumstances and on the ground of
parity, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the
petitioner in the present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 of
the BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-
petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on
bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
(Downloaded on 13/03/2025 at 09:44:44 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:13776] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3044/2025]
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
275-Pramod/-
(Downloaded on 13/03/2025 at 09:44:44 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)