Eastern Chemofarb Pvt. Ltd vs Eastern Chemofarb Pvt. Ltd. Permanent … on 13 August, 2025

0
5

[ad_1]

1. The writ application has been preferred challenging an award dated

8th April, 2025 passed by the learned Judge, 9th Industrial Tribunal,

Durgapur.

2. The petitioner‟s case is that it is a company engaged in the business

of manufacturing “lac” and has its factory at Purulia wherein it has

employed not exceeding the figure of 80 workmen at any material

point of time.

2

3. Respondent no. 1 is the Trade Union which has purportedly raised

an industrial dispute over the issue of suspension of work at the

factory of the petitioner company.

4. The petitioner company had been facing severe operational

challenges including loss of market shares and lack of orders and

expected cooperation and extension of commitment from the side of

the workers to keep the factory operational. The management gave a

proposal on 26th September, 2019 that instead of paying idle wages

to the entire work force at the factory, it would be expedient for the

survival of the employees as well as the management that the

workers might accept the proposal to work for 15 days a month on

rotation basis.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here