Elumalai vs Sheela Yogesh on 26 May, 2025

0
6

The complainant has filed this complaint against the accused

under section 200 of the Cr.P.C, alleging that, the accused has

committed an offense punishable under section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The brief facts of the complainant’s case are as follows :

The complainant submits that the accused, known him for

several years and being his close friend, and her husband sought

financial assistance of Rs.4 lakh from the complainant;

accordingly, the accused and her husband executed a credit

agreement dated 28.06.2017. The accused promised to repay the

said amount within one year. After the completion of the stipulated

period, the complainant approached the accused and demanded to

pay the loan amount. After repeated requests, the accused was

issued a cheque bearing 000017 dated 08.04.2019 for Rs. 4 lakh,

drawn on PMC Bank Limited, Mahalakshmi Layout Branch,

Bengaluru. The accused had assured the complainant that the

cheque would be honoured on its presentation, reposing the

CC No. 12981 / 2019

confidence in the assurance given by the accused. The complainant

presented the said cheque for collection on the same day to his

banker, i.e., Canara Bank, Srirampura Branch, Bengaluru. But the

said cheque came to be dishonoured due to ‘insufficient funds’ as

per the bank endorsement dated 09.04.2019. The factum of

dishonour of the cheque was duly communicated to the accused by

issuing a legal notice dated 15.04.2019, which was duly served to

the accused. Despite the service of notice, the accused neither paid

the cheque amount nor issued a reply notice; hence, the

complainant has filed his complaint against the accused.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here