CORAM :HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
—
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
: Mrs. Swati Shalini, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mrs. M.M. Pal, Senior Advocate
: Ms. Ruby Pandey, Advocate
: Ms. Apoorva Singh, Amicus
—
th
C.A.V. On 16 December 2024 Pronounced on 11th March 2025
1. The office note of this writ records reveals that the notice issued
to the respondent returned unserved by stating that the notice was
refused but a vakalatnama has been filed by Sujit Kumar Shaw in his
individual capacity without any mention of the respondent Ex-
employees’ Coordination Committee, Mosabani and without any seal.
A counter affidavit has also been filed. Neither in the Vakalatnama
nor in the counter affidavit it has been stated that Sujit Kumar Shaw is
the general secretary of the respondent Ex-employees’ Coordination
Committee, Mosabani and is pursuing the case on behalf of himself
and also on behalf of 413 ex-employees in representative capacity.
Since the Vakalatnama has been filed in individual capacity, it cannot
be said that Sujit Kumar Shaw is representing all other 413 ex-
employees before this Court or even representing the respondent Ex-
employees’ Coordination Committee, Mosabani. However, the case
has been extensively argued on the basis of materials available on
record. An amicus was also appointed by this Court who has also
assisted this Court in the matter.