Farida Khanam vs Dr. Md. Shamim Khan on 19 August, 2025

0
2


Date: 19-08-2025
Heard Mr.Dhananjay Kumar learned counsel for

the appellant and Mr.Ratan Kumar Sinha learned counsel for the

respondent.

2. The present appeal has been filed against the

order dated 16.04.2019 passed by the learned Sub-Judge-XII,

Hajipur Vaishali, in Partition Suit No. 395 of 2012 by which the

learned Court refuses to grant temporary injunction in respect of

the part of the suit properties of Schedule IV of the plaint.

3. The brief facts of the case is that plaintiff and

defendants are descendants of Abdul Samad Khan who was

father of plaintiff and the defendants. The property described in

Schedule IV of the plaint has been inherited by the plaintiff and

the defendants from their father and mother which are the joint

property and are liable to be partitioned between them. The

plaintiff has jointly inherited with them and got interest in the

said property but defendant no. 3 Md. Wasim Khan in order to

deprive the plaintiff from her lawful share is adamant to make
Patna High Court MA No.451 of 2019 dt.19-08-2025

construction and has partly constructed building and thereby

changing the physical feature of the joint property. The

defendants have transferred several parts of suit property prior

to filing of the suit and the defendants no. 3 has already sold

some land even during the pendency of the suit. Presently the

defendants have been negotiating to sale the rest part of the suit

property described in Schedule IV of plaint. Hence, the plaintiff

had filed the instant suit for partition.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here