Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Gamer Singh @ John @ Raju vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28135) on 1 July, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:28135]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7132/2025
Gamer Singh @ John @ Raju S/o Jaspal Singh, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Rawli Isarwal Salumber District Udaipur (Raj.)
(Presently Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ojas Shakdwipeeya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
01/07/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 BNSS at
the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 283/2023 2. Concerned Police Station Dabok 3. District Udaipur 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 458, 394, 307, 323, 427 of IPC 5. Offences added, if any Under Section 395 of IPC
6. Date of passing of impugned 09.04.2025
order
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no
case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his
incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in
the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the
(Downloaded on 03/07/2025 at 09:31:53 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:28135] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7132/2025]
accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based
on conjectures and surmises.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record. The star
witness has denied from identifying the petitioner and nothing
is recovered from the petitioner. There is high probability that
the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these
facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the
benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439
Cr.P.C./483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the
accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
74-chhavi/-
(Downloaded on 03/07/2025 at 09:31:53 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)