Ganesh Vilasrao Mahalle vs State Of Mha. Thr. Pso Khamgaon (City) … on 20 December, 2024

0
40

Bombay High Court

Ganesh Vilasrao Mahalle vs State Of Mha. Thr. Pso Khamgaon (City) … on 20 December, 2024

Author: Avinash G. Gharote

Bench: Avinash G. Gharote

2024:BHC-NAG:14132-DB




                                            1                 apl898.2023..odt


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                             CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 898 OF 2023
                                               WITH
                             CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1698 OF 2024

                   CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 898 OF 2023
                   1. Ganesh Vilasrao Mahalle,
                   Age 32 yrs, occ.Labour,
                   R/o. Ghatpuri, Tq. Khamgaon,
                   District Buldhana                          ...... APPLICANT

                        ...V E R S U S...

                   1. The State of Maharashtra,
                   through a Police Station Officer,
                   Khamgaon (City), Khamgaon,
                   Tq. Khamgaon, District Buldhana,

                   2. Smt. Shubhangi Vishal Ghule,
                   Age about 44 yrs, occ. Doctor,
                   R/o. In front of Panchayat Samiti,
                   Khamgaon, Tq. Khamgaon,
                   District Buldhana                       .....NON-APPLICANTS


                   CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1698 OF 2024
                   1. Pankaj s/o Wamanrao Ghule,
                   aged about 49 yrs, Occ. Business,
                   R/o Shukla layout, Khamgaon,
                   Tq. Khamgaon, District Buldhana

                   2. Vandana w/o Dattatraya Mundhe,
                   Aged about 52 yrs, Occ. Housewife,
                   R/o Hiwarda, Tq & Dist Osmanabad

                   3. Ramesh s/o Ramanlal Bhattad,
                   Aged about 42 yrs, Occ. Advocate,
                   R/o Akola Bazar, Khamgaon,
                   Tq. Khamgaon, Dist Buldhana                 ...... APPLICANTS
                                 2                                 apl898.2023..odt


     ...V E R S U S...

1. The State of Maharashtra,
through a Police Station Officer,
Police Station Khamgaon (City),
Tq. Khamgaon, District Buldhana,

2. Smt. Shubhangi Wd/o Vishal Ghule,
Age about 39 yrs, occ. Doctor,
R/o. In front of Panchayat Samiti,
Khamgaon, Tq. Khamgaon,
District Buldhana                                                  NON-APPLICANTS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. A.A. Naik, Sr. Advocate a/b Mr. P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for
applicants in APL 1698/2024
Mr. V.S. Alone, Advocate for applicant in APL 898/2023.
Mr. I.J. Damle, APP for non-applicant No.1/State.
Mr. A.D. Bhate, Advocate for non-applicant No.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM:- AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE      : 20.12.2024


JUDGMENT (Per : Abhay J. Mantri, J.)

Heard. Admit. Since both criminal applications arise

from Crime No. 143/2023, they are heard by consent of the learned

Counsel for the parties and decided by this common judgment.

2. These applications seek to quash and set aside Crime No.

143/2023, registered with Police Station Khamgaon City, for the

offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, and 120(B)

of the Indian Penal Code. ( for short- ‘IPC‘).

3 apl898.2023..odt

3. The gist of the applications is that non-applicant No. 2

alleges that the applicants made a conspiracy and prepared a false

will. Thereby, the applicants fraudulently or dishonestly use the said

will as genuine, which they know or have reason to believe to be a

forged document, so also the applicants were a party to a criminal

conspiracy to commit an offence. Thus, the applicants have

committed a criminal breach of trust. Therefore, the complainant

lodged a report against the applicants. Based on the complaint,

offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, and 120(B)

of the Indian Penal Code came to be registered against the

applicants vide Crime No. 143/2023.

4. Being aggrieved by the registration of FIR and criminal

proceedings arising thereof, applicants filed this application to

quash and set aside the same since the allegations made therein do

not constitute the commission of any of the offences.

5. Mr. Naik, the learned senior counsel, submits that the

dispute between the parties has been amicably settled before

learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Khambaon, in Regular Civil Suit

No. 148/2022. Accordingly, they have tendered consent terms
4 apl898.2023..odt

before the said Court, a copy of which is produced on record of this

Court. He drew our attention to paragraph 6 of the consent terms.

He canvassed that non-applicant No. 2 has agreed to give no

objection to quash criminal proceedings bearing RCC No.195/2024

arising out of Crime No. 143/2023 registered at Khamgaon Police

Station.

6. A perusal of the record shows that during the pendency

of the application, the dispute between the applicants and non-

applicant No. 2 has been resolved amicably. Accordingly, both have

filed consent terms before the Civil Judge Junior Division,

Khamgaon, in Regular Civil Suit No. 148/2022. Notably, non-

applicant No. 2 filed an affidavit in reply to APL No. 1698/2024 and

averred that the dispute between herself and the applicants had

amicably resolved. Accordingly, a compromise decree has been

drawn in Regular Civil Suit No. 148/2022; pursuant to the decree,

she assented to the quashment of R.C.C. No. 195/2024 pending on

the file of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khamgaon.

7. The applicants in both applications and non-applicant

No. 2 are present before the Court, and their respective counsel
5 apl898.2023..odt

identified them. They have reiterated the contents of the consent

terms dated 21/11/2024 and stated that the matter had been

amicably settled between them. Pursuant to that, non-applicant No.

2 states that she does not want to proceed with the Criminal

proceedings against the applicants arising out of Crime No.

143/2023 and has voluntarily given no objection to quash the same.

8. Thus, it seems that the matter has been amicably settled

between the parties, and a compromise decree has been drawn in

Regular Civil Suit No. 148/2022; pursuant to the decree, non-

applicant No. 2 assented to the quashing of Regular Criminal Case

No. 195/2024 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate First Class,

Khamgaon. Accordingly, non-applicant No. 2 filed an affidavit in

reply to APL No. 1698/2024 and averred that the dispute between

herself and the applicants had amicably resolved. She has assented

to quash the criminal proceedings. Moreover, the nature of the

offence is neither heinous nor anti-social, but the same arises out of

the property dispute. Therefore, in our view, there is no reason to

continue with the prosecution.

6 apl898.2023..odt

9. In the wake of the above, it would be proper to allow the

applications in terms of the settlement as it would not cause

prejudice to any of the parties. We are satisfied that the case is made

out to exercise our inherent powers to secure the ends of justice and

to prevent abuse of the process of the law. Hence, we pass the

following order:

(i) Both Criminal Applications are allowed in terms of
payer clause 1 in application no.1698/2024.

                                                 (ii)     The applications stand disposed of.




                                           (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)              (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)




              Belkhede




Signed by: Mr. R. S. Belkhede
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 24/12/2024 17:00:34
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here