Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Ganesha Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27019) on 12 June, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:27019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6948/2025
Ganesha Ram S/o Babu Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village
Nimbla P.s Nagana District Barmer Raj. (At Present Lodged In
District Jail Sirohi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.J. Punia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rathore, DyGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
12/06/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 483 of the BNSS at the
instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 140/2025 2. Concerned Police Station Abu Road RIICO 3. District Sirohi 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Excise Act 5. Offences added, if any -
6. Date of passing of impugned 05.06.2025
order
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that the
offences alleged are triable by a Court of magistrate. No case
for the alleged offences is made out against him and his
incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in
(Downloaded on 12/06/2025 at 09:32:09 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27019] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6948/2025]
the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the
accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based
on conjectures and surmises.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record. The
offences alleged are triable by a Court of magistrate. There is
high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude.
In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed
suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the
present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 of
the BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-
petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on
bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
60-Pramod/-
(Downloaded on 12/06/2025 at 09:32:09 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)