Garlapati Prakasam vs Garlapti Jaggaiah Died And 24 Others on 26 June, 2025

0
4


Challenging the order dated 07.09.2007 passed in

I.A.No.297 of 2003 in O.S.No.24 of 1986 by the learned Senior

Civil Judge, Bhongir, the present Appeal Suit is filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that O.S.No.24 of 1986

filed by the plaintiff claiming partition of his joint family

ancestral properties listed under Schedule “A” (landed) and

Schedule “B” (residential houses). The plaintiff, through his

father Annanthaiah, sought a legitimate share in the

properties. After contest, the trial court dismissed the suit on

24.04.1991, rejecting the claim, but the plaintiff appealed to

this Court in A.S.No.1730 of 1991, which, upon detailed

adjudication, reversed the decision of the trial Court and

passed a preliminary decree on 05.03.2003. The decree duly

recognized that Annanthaiah was entitled to a fifty percent

share, while defendant Nos.1 and 2 each had a one-fourth

share in the properties, and it directed that the properties be

partitioned accordingly.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here