Ghasiram Munda @ Majhla Munda vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 8 July, 2025

0
71

Jharkhand High Court

Ghasiram Munda @ Majhla Munda vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 8 July, 2025

Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

                                                                [2025:JHHC:18316]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                     B.A. No.5513 of 2025
                                  ------

Ghasiram Munda @ Majhla Munda, aged about 27 years, son of late
Mangal Munda, resident of village Dalaikela, P.O. and P.S.
Kharsawan, District- Seraikella Kharsawan
…. …. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Opposite Party

——

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

——

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P

——

Order No.03 Dated-08-07-2025
Heard the parties.

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kuchai P.S.
Case No.17 of 2022 (S/1) registered for the offence punishable under Section
302
, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against
the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of Bhusan Saw. It is
next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then
submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR yet he has been
implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-
accused Lodra Purty, who has already been admitted to bail. It is then
submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then
submitted that no T.I. Parade has been conducted in this case and there is no
previous enmity of the petitioner with the deceased. It is then submitted that
the petitioner has been in custody since 02.04.2025 as is evident from para-10
of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has
no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-4 of the supplementary
affidavit. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-
operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be
released on bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of
the petitioner.

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Seraikella in connection with Kuchai P.S.
Case No.17 of 2022 (S/1) with the condition that he will co-operate with the
trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar
Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his
mobile number during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Saroj/

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here