[ad_1]
Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Gokeda Yesu Kumar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 July, 2025
ri,.'-¥Ti`RE
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANE)HRA PRADESH AT AMA
THURSDAY, THE TLi!RD DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
: PRE§,ENT: tfads=
THE HONOURABLE SRI JuRSFieE K SREENIVASA REDDY -ff=+st
CRIMINAL PE"Ti®RI. NO: 6023 OF 2025
Betwee n :
Gokeda Yesu Kumar, s/o, Late Apparao, Age 24 yea-rs, R/o. Satyavaram
Village, V,Madugula Mandal, Anakapaili District.
... Petitioner/Accused No,1
- ;fiRE,B .
The State Of Andhra Pradesh, (\/-. iviadugu]a Police Station) Rep. by the
public prosecutor High Court of Andhra~Pradesh Amaravati, Guntur
District. .I .
`'',l`` .... Respondent/Comp[ainant
petition under section 480 &± `4S-3 '`of|BNSS is filed, praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit fiiec! in support of the Criminal Petition,
the High Court may be pleased to r`e'eJase him on regular bail in connection
with Crime No.222 of 2024 of V. Madirguia Police Station.
I
The petition coming on for heriring, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit filed in support thereof amdLe!jpon hearing the arguments of SRI
ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN AdvoGa€er 'for the Petitioner, Assistant Public
prosecutor for the respondent and +lire C;Quit made the following.
ORDER
€..I
i–5
APHCO10292482025
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3327]
(special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6023/2025
Betwee n :
1.GOKEDA YESU KUMAR, S/O. LATE APPARAO, AGE 24 YEARS,
R/O. SATYAVARAM VILLAGE, V.MADUGULA MANDAL,
ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
.HPETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, (V. Madugula Police
Station) Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra
Pradesh Amaravati, Guntur District.
…RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
petition under section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of
BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of
Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to release him on
regular ba’Il in connection With Crime No.222 of 2024 of V. Madugula
Police Station, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN-
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the
<`-t*.tlr I,-
2
pet’lt-loner/A1, seeking bail, in Crime No.222/2024 of V.Madugula Police
station, Anakapal[e District.
2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and Others for
the offences under –Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 read with 8(c) of the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 12.ll,2024 at 4.00pm,
on receipt of credible information regarding illegal possession and
transportation of ganja, the S.I of Police, along with staff, reached BT
Road (Paderu to Visakhapatnam) outskirts of Sagaram village and
started conducting vehicle checking. They found one Auto bearing
registration no.AP 31 TC 1700 coming towards ghat road side. On
seeing police, the inmates in the Auto stopped the Auto and escaped.
Then police searched the Auto and found 12kgs of ganja. The
contraband was seized and on 10.4.2025 accused was arrested and
remanded to judicial custody.
4. Heard learned counsel forthe Petitioner and the learned Assistant
public prosecutor for respondent-State. Perused the record,
5. Leamed Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that majOrPartOfthe
investigation is completed except filing of charge sheet.
€--sJan,
- -JF> -_-A ex`
3
6. A perusal of the material available on record goes to showthat the
contraband that was allegedly seI-Zed from the Auto was 12 kgs of ganja
which is not a commercial quantity. The petitioner was arrested on
10.4.2025 and since then, the petitioner has been in judicI-al remand. It
appears that major Part Of the I-nVeStigatiOn has been completed except
filing of charge sheet.
7. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this
Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner hereI-n, On the following
conditions.
(i) The petitioner/Al herein shall be released on his executI’ng a
Personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with
two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I
Additional DI’StrjCt and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam,-
(ii) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the station
House Officer concerned once in a week i.e. on every sunday
between 10.00 a.m. and o5.00 p.m., till filing of charge sheet.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed.
SD/-M,SRIN!VAS
ASSISTANlasG iSTRAR
I lTFXHE: Cds:ds®PY I I `
I SECT!Oni OFFICER
To, . i. .` `~.= ,A
1. The I Addltional Dlstrlct & sess!aor!s Judge, vlsakhapatnam
2 The superlntendent, central pnson, vISakhapatnam DI’Stnct.
3. The SHO, V.Madugula Poll’ce sfa{iQn, Anakapal’I’ Dlstrl’ct
4. One cc to SRI ARRABOLU SA! NAVEEN Advocate [opucJ
5. Two ccs to PUBLIC PROSEC’JTOR, HIgh Court ofAndhra
Pradesh.[ouTJ
6. One spare copy
ksr
HIGH’,-COURT
SRK, J
DATED : 03/07/2025
BAIL ORDER
CRLP.No.6023 of 2025
ALLOWED
[ad_2]
Source link