Gopal Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 June, 2025

0
2


Chattisgarh High Court

Gopal Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 June, 2025

Author: Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench: Parth Prateem Sahu

                                                          1




                                                                           2025:CGHC:22922
                                                                                      NAFR

                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                              MCRC No. 3871 of 2025

                   1 - Gopal Yadav S/o Shibo Yadav Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Diyagarh,
                   Indira Awas Para, Police Station - Lailunga, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh
                                                                                    --- Applicant
                                                      versus
                   1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Lailunga, District - Raigarh
                   Chhattisgarh
                                                                              ---- Respondent

For Applicant : Mr. Kishore Narayan, Advocate
For Respondent/State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Govt. Advocate
For Objector/Complainant : Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate

Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board
10/06/2025

1. Applicant has filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the

Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail as he
BALRAM
PRASAD has been arrested in connection with Crime No.137/2023, registered
DEWANGAN
Digitally signed
by BALRAM at Police Station – Lailunga, District – Raigarh (C.G.) for offence
PRASAD
DEWANGAN

punishable under Section 302, 120-B, 201, 212, 34 of the Indian Penal

Code, and Section 25, 27 of Arms Act.

2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for applicant seeks

permission of this Court to withdraw this bail application at this stage.
2

He however, submits that as the applicant is in jail since 19.05.2023

and none of the prosecution witnesses have been examined till date,

the learned trial Court be directed to expedite the trial.

3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, this

bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Further considering the

date of detention of applicant since 19.05.2023 and the submission of

learned counsel for the applicant that none of the prosecution

witnesses have been examined till date, the learned trial Court is

directed to make all endeavour and necessary measure to cause

appearance of the prosecution witnesses and to expedite the trial.

Sd/-

(Parth Prateem Sahu)
Judge
Balram



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here