Gopalan Sasidharan vs Soman Pillai on 26 August, 2025

0
2

This appeal has been filed by respondents 1 & 2, who are the

driver and owner of the offending vehicle respectively, in OP(MV)

No.1537 of 2006 on the files of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Kollam. The respondents 1 & 2 herein were the claimant and the insurer

respectively before the tribunal.

2. The case of the claimant was that on 03.05.2006, while

he was riding a scooter bearing Reg.No.KL-03/M 864, a scorpio car

bearing Reg.No.KL-04/V 905 driven by the first respondent in a rash

and negligent manner, hit the scooter, whereby he sustained serious

injuries. He approached the tribunal claiming a total compensation of

₹1,10,000/-.

3. Respondents 1 and 2, who are the driver and the

owner of the offending vehicle respectively, filed a written statement

denying negligence and contending that the petition is not maintainable.

The third respondent insurer filed a written statement, admitting the

policy coverage for the offending vehicle, but disputing the liability and

quantum of compensation claimed. PW1 and RW1 were examined and

Exts.A1 to A12 & B1 to B6 were marked. The tribunal, after analysing
2025:KER:64705

..3..



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here