The present petition has been preferred against the
impugned order dated 12.12.2017, whereby objections filed by
the present petitioner to the Execution Petition filed by the
respondents in the case at hand has been dismissed.
2. Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings
and impugned order.
3. The present respondent had filed suit for recovery on
22.7.2015. In the suit, it was alleged that the present petitioner
had borrowed money from the present respondent in the month of
March, 2013 as he wanted to purchase Apple Crop on contract
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?