[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Govinda Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025
Author: Purnendu Singh
Bench: Purnendu Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50616 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2024 Thana- PARSA District- Saran
======================================================
1. Govinda Kumar son of Birendra Ray @ Virendra Ray village - Khajauli, P. S
- Dernibajar , District - Saran
2. Nirmala Kumari Daughter of Nagendra Prasad Singh village - Khajauli, P. S
- Danibajar , District - Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hemant Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2025
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioners seeks to withdraw the prayer for pre-arrest bail
on behalf of the petitioner no.1 informing that petitioner no.1
has been arrested during the pendency of the bail application.
3. The prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.1 is
dismissed as withdrawn.
4. The petitioner no. 2 seeks pre-arrest bail in
connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 92 of 2024 registered for
the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 188, 341, 323,
324, 307, 353, 332, 333 and 56/34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50616 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
2/3
Sections 3/4 of the Public Property Damage Act.
5. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the
petitioners are said to have pelted stones on the police party and
also obstructed them in discharge of their duties.
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submitted that the petitioner no.2 is quite innocent
and has committed no offence as alleged. 40-50 persons had
blocked the road with a dead body to protest. The petitioner no.2
who is a lady can only be said to be member of the mob.
Petitioner has clean antecedent.
7. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
8. Considering the nature of allegation made against
the petitioner no.2 to be general and omnibus and the fact that
she happens to be member of the mob, petitioner no.2, Nirmala
Kumari is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event
of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period
of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-IX, Saran / concerned
court in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 92 of 2024, subject
to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C /
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50616 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
3/3
482(2) BNSS.
9. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner no.2 and if it is found that the
petitioner no.2 is involved in some other cases as what has been
stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically
lose its force.
10. The bail application stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link