Gumpu Sri Vishnu Teja , Vishnu Teja vs The State Of Bank Of India on 13 August, 2025

0
26

Heard Mr. C. Damodar Reddy, learned Senior

Counsel appearing for Mr. C. Ruthwik Reddy, learned counsel

for petitioner and Mr. B.S. Prasad, learned Senior Counsel

appearing for M/s Pearl Law Associates for Respondents.

2. The case of petitioner is that he entered the service

of respondent bank in 2009 as Assistant and subsequently, on

28-04-2013, he was transferred and posted as Junior Assistant

at SBI, Ganesh Nagar Branch, Mahabubnagar, where he

rendered dedicated service to respondent bank and as a token

of his hard work, he was promoted as Senior Assistant and

posted at SBI, Main Branch, Clock Tower, Mahabubnagar and

directed him to report on 01-06-2018, after undergoing training,

as such, he was relieved from Ganesh Nagar Branch on

20-05-2018 itself. The further case of petitioner is that on

15-12-2018, the Regional Manager, SBI, Mahabubnagar gave

written report dated 05-11-2018 to SHO, I Town Police Station,

Mahabubnagar against him and four (4) Gold Loan Customers

of respondent bank alleging that eleven (11) gold bags are

missing and they have played fraud on the bank by opening

Fifteen (15) fictitious accounts during the period from January,

2016 to May, 2018 through quick Gold Loan mode and

misappropriated the amount to a tune of Rs.35.61 lakhs and

basing on which Crime No.173 of 2018 under Section 408 IPC.

was registered against him and others. On 13-02-2019,

Regional Manager, SBI, Mahabubnagar called for explanation of

petitioner in respect of seven (7) lapses indicated therein, on

receipt of the same, petitioner submitted reply dated

23-03-2019 denying the allegations and explaining the alleged

lapses.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here