Guraditta @ Guru Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 6 March, 2025

0
5

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Guraditta @ Guru Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 6 March, 2025

                                                          1




                                           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                       CRIMINAL APPEAL    NO(S).     2325/2014



     GURADITTA @ GURU SINGH                                                      APPELLANT(S)

                                                         VERSUS

     THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN                                                      RESPONDENT(S)




                                                        O R D E R

1. We are hearing the matter for the second time after

having dismissed it on the last date of hearing, and

thereafter having recalled the said order of dismissal.

This is a case where the occurrence is stated to have

taken place way back in the year 2000. The appellant and

the co-accused had been convicted by the trial court for

the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 201/34

of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and accordingly sentenced

to life imprisonment and fine. The High Court, vide the

impugned order, has confirmed the same. Both the Courts

have concurrently convicted the appellant taking into

consideration circumstantial evidence including the extra
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2025.03.10
16:03:58 IST
Reason:
judicial confession made by the co-accused to PW-1, PW-2

and PW-3, the recovery of the body of the deceased as
2

established by PW-6, the recovery of the weapon used in

the commission of the offence, and the medical evidence.

In such view of the matter, we are not inclined to

interfere with the impugned order and thus reiterate the

view expressed by us on the earlier occasion.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that

the co-accused has been released under the policy

governing premature release of prisoners. The appellant

had undergone incarceration for nearly 13½ years and has

been on bail since 2016, vide order dated 25.07.2016. As

per the governing remission policy, the appellant will be

eligible to be considered for remission only after the

completion of 14 years of the sentence imposed on him.

The occurrence is of the year 2000. Therefore, this is a

fit case for Article 142 of the Constitution of India to

be invoked, by treating the incarceration undergone by

the appellant as 14 years and, thereafter, applying the

remission policy.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that

it is true that the co-accused has been released under

the applicable remission policy. However, the appellant,

not having undergone the requisite period of

incarceration, cannot be considered for remission, as per

the governing policy.

3

4. We are inclined to invoke Article 142 of the Constitution

of India, taking into consideration the facts and

circumstances of the present case. Admittedly, the

appellant has undergone more than 13 years of the

sentence imposed on him, and has been on bail since

almost 9 years. The occurrence is also of the year 2000.

5. In such view of the matter, we direct the respondent to

consider the case of the appellant as if he has completed

14 years of actual incarceration and accordingly, apply

the remission policy. Appropriate orders in this regard

shall be passed within a period of eight weeks from

today.

6. Until such time, the appellant need not surrender. We

make it clear that we are passing this order on the

peculiar facts of the case.

7. The appeal is disposed of, accordingly.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

……………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]

……………………………………………………J.
[K.V. VISWANATHAN]

NEW DELHI;

6th MARCH, 2025
                                    4




ITEM NO.101                 COURT NO.8                SECTION II

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Criminal Appeal    No(s).   2325/2014

GURADITTA @ GURU SINGH                                Appellant(s)

                                   VERSUS

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN                                Respondent(s)

original record received

Date : 06-03-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, AOR
Mr. Kaushalendra Dutt Pandey, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SWETA BALODI)                                  (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                (Signed order is placed on the file)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here