Gursev Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 14 May, 2025

0
11


Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Gursev Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 14 May, 2025

                                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S).           /2025
                                   (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.)No. 13602/2023)

                      GURSEV SINGH                                                      APPELLANT(s)

                                                         VERSUS

                      STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.                                         RESPONDENT(s)

                                                    O R D E R

Leave granted.

2. The legality and correctness of the order dated

10.10.2023 passed in CRM M No.43187 of 2020 by the High Court

of Punjab and Haryana, has been assailed in this appeal.

3. Briefly stated the facts are that the appellant herein

had preferred a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal

Procedure Code, 1973 (for short “Code”) seeking quashing of FIR

No.35 dated 19.02.2020 filed under Sections 406, 420, 506 of

the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Zirakpur, District

Mohali (S.A.S. Nagar) and all subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom.

4. On 10.10.2023, learned counsel for the appellant before

the High Court had sought for an adjournment by a written

request. In response to that, learned counsel for the State on

instructions submitted that one out of eight prosecution

witnesses had already been examined.

In view of the above, the petition was ordered to be
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
RADHA SHARMA
Date: 2025.05.20
disposed of with liberty to the appellant herein to raise all
10:44:16 IST
Reason:

grounds before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage.

1
Being aggrieved by the said order inasmuch as the

petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code

not being considered on merits by the High Court, the appellant

has preferred this appeal.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and

learned counsel for first respondent-State and we have perused

the material on record.

6. All that the appellant is seeking is for consideration of

his petition filed under Section 482 of the Code under which

the appellant has sought for quashing of FIR No. 35 dated

19.02.2020 which has been filed against him. On a perusal of

the impugned order, we find that the High Court has not

considered the said petition on merits and instead when an

adjournment was sought by the appellant herein who was the

petitioner before the High Court, on the basis of the

submissions made by the State – counsel, the said petition has

been simply disposed.

7. In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and

remand the matter to the High Court by restoring CRM-M-

No.43187/2020 (O & M) on the file of the High Court with a

request to the High Court to hear the said petition on merits

and to dispose of the same in accordance with law and as

expeditiously as possible.

8. The appeal is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid

terms.

2

9. Till disposal of the aforesaid petition by the High

Court, no coercive steps shall be taken as against the

appellant herein vis-a-vis the aforesaid FIR.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

………………………………………………………,J.

( B.V. NAGARATHNA )

…………………………………………………………,J.

( SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA )
NEW DELHI;

MAY 14, 2025




                                     3
ITEM NO.8                     COURT NO.6                   SECTION II-B

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 13602/2023
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-10-2023
in CRM-M No. 43187/2020 passed by the High Court of Punjab &
Haryana at Chandigarh]

GURSEV SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. Respondent(s)

Date : 14-05-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Adv.

Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.

Ms. Drishti Rawal, Adv.

Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv.
Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv.

Ms. Aakanksha, Adv.

Ms. Ishika Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Sarthak Arya, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Ms. Nupur Kumar, AOR
Ms. Niharika Tanwar, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed and disposed of in terms of the

signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(RADHA SHARMA) (AKSHAY KUMAR BHORIA)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
(Signed order is placed on the file)

4



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here