Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Gurupreet Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:25174) on 22 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:25174]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4345/2025
Gurupreet Singh S/o Dalijeet Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
1C Chhoti Post Office 3-C Chhoti, Sriganganagar, District -
Sriganganagar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Charan
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hathi Singh Jodha, Public
Prosecutor
Mr. Virendra Acharya for the
complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
22/05/2025
This application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the
BNSS (old Section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner
apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.51/2025,
registered at Police Station Sadar Bikaner, District – Bikaner for
offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of
the BNS.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public
Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. Perused
the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a complaint
has been filed complainant Rajesh Kumar before the Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Bikaner against the accused
(Downloaded on 29/05/2025 at 09:22:04 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:25174] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-4345/2025]
Jaskaran, Gurpreet Singh Saini and Mohit Chauhan (Ramanpal) to
the effect that the complainant prepares for competitive
examinations for government service. Accused Gurpreet Singh is
an acquaintance of the Shashikant who is Jija of the complainant
Rajesh Kumar. Said Gurpreet Singh stated that his brother-in-law
Jaskaran helps in getting Government jobs. He assured the
complainant to get a Government job. On his asking for arranging
money to give them, complaint’s father took a home loan of
Rs.15,00,000/- and transferred the said amount in the account of
Jaskaran and Mohit. They also transferred the remaining amount
as per their demand and bank statements of these transaction are
on record. Thus, a total amount of Rs.21,00,000/- has been
cheated from the complainant. Accused Jaskaran Singh along
with co-accused Parul Dhaka, Gurpreet Singh, Ramanpal @ Mohit
Couhan hatched a criminal conspiracy and prepared forged and
fabricated documents and gave forged joining letter and I-Card of
Income Tax Department, Dehli to complainant Rajesh Kumar. They
also undertook a false medical from Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital,
Delhi and thereafter got training to Rajesh Kumar in Vyapar
Bhawan, New Delhi and thus they have taken Rs.21,00,000/- from
the complainant Rajesh Kumar and cheated the complainant and
took away his hard earned money.
Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that accused-
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has
not hatched any conspiracy with the co-accused Jaskaran, Parul
Dhaka, Ramanpal @ Mohit Couhan to cheat the complainant. He
has not received any amount from the complainant. The whole
(Downloaded on 29/05/2025 at 09:22:04 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:25174] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-4345/2025]
story of the prosecution is false and concocted. He therefore,
prayed that the petitioner-accused may be enlarged on bail.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel
for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
While submitting the factual report dated 21.04.2025, sent by
SHO, P.S. Sadar Bikaner, they submitted that accused has
committed a serious crime. Accused Gurpreet Singh is an
acquaintance of the Shashikant who is Jija of the complainant
Rajesh Kumar. Said Gurpreet Singh stated that his brother-in-law
Jaskaran helps in getting Government jobs. He assured the
complainant to get a Government job. On his asking for arranging
money to give them, complaint’s father took a home loan of
Rs.15,00,000/- and transferred the said amount in the account of
Jaskaran and Mohit. They also transferred the remaining amount
as per their demand and bank statements of these transaction are
on record. Thus, a total amount of Rs.21,00,000/- has been
cheated from the complainant. Accused Jaskaran Singh along with
co-accused persons namely – Parul Dhaka, Gurpreet Singh,
Ramanpal @ Mohit Couhan hatched a criminal conspiracy and
prepared forged and fabricated documents and gave forged
joining letter and I-Card of Income Tax Department, Dehli to
complainant Rajesh Kumar. They also undertook a false medical
from Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi and thereafter got training
to Rajesh Kumar in Vyapar Bhawan, New Delhi and thus they have
taken Rs.21,00,000/- from the complainant Rajesh Kumar and
cheated him. Accused persons also gave joining letter and I-Card
to the witness Dushyant for the post of D.O. in the Jhansi Division
(Downloaded on 29/05/2025 at 09:22:04 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:25174] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-4345/2025]
of the Indian Railways. He submitted that the investigation from
the present petitioner is pending. In case he is released on
anticipatory bail, there will be effect on the investigation.
Therefore, he prayed that looking to the gravity of the offence,
benefit of anticipatory bail may not be extended to the petitioner.
From perusal of the factual report, it is revealed that Accused
Gurpreet Singh was an acquaintance of the Shashikant who is Jija
of the complainant Rajesh Kumar. Said Gurpreet Singh stated that
his brother-in-law Jaskaran helps in getting Government jobs. He
assured the complainant to get a Government job. On his asking
for arranging money to give them, complaint’s father took a home
loan of Rs.15,00,000/- and transferred the said amount in the
account of Jaskaran and Mohit. They also transferred the
remaining amount as per their demand and bank statements of
these transaction are on record. Thus, a total amount of
Rs.21,00,000/- has been cheated from the complainant.
The investigation from the present petitioner is stated to be
pending. The role of the present petitioner will be ascertained
after the investigation.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the
case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the
petitioner is rejected at this stage.
The factual report dated 21.04.2025 is taken on record.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
96-Ramesh Goyal, P.S./-
(Downloaded on 29/05/2025 at 09:22:04 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)