Hakam @Jarrah vs State Of Haryana on 14 July, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Hakam @Jarrah vs State Of Haryana on 14 July, 2025

Bench: Sudhanshu Dhulia, Aravind Kumar

                                                       1

     ITEM NO.9                               COURT NO.8                   SECTION II-B

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                      No(s).    4006/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-01-2025
     in CRMM No. 44080/2024 (O&M) passed by the High Court of Punjab &
     Haryana at Chandigarh]

     HAKAM @ JARRAH                                                          Petitioner(s)
                                                      VERSUS

     STATE OF HARYANA                                                       Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 68068/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT, IA No. 68064/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

     Date : 14-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Saifuddin Shams, Adv.
                                        Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain, AOR
                                        Mr. Abdul Mannan, Adv.
                                        Mr. Ashish Ranjan, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                  Mr. Amit Kumar, A.A.G.
                                        Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR
                                        Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv.
                                        Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv.

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

The petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the

offences punishable under Sections 332, 353, 186, 224, 225,

511, 427 & 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the

Arms Act and Section 3(2) of Prevention of Damage to Public
Signature Not Verified
Property Act. His bail application was dismissed by the High
Digitally signed by
Nirmala Negi
Date: 2025.07.17
15:10:39 IST
Reason: Court. Being aggrieved, he has approached this Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

respondent-State.

2

At this stage, we do not see any reason to grant bail to

the petitioner, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article

136 of the Constitution of India.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew the

bail application depending upon the stage of trial after six

months before the Court concerned, if so advised.

The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed in the

above terms along with pending application(s), if any.

(NIRMALA NEGI)                                 (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR