Harbajan Singh vs Superintendent Of Police Ajmer on 14 August, 2025

0
2

For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Samdaria Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Additional
Government Counsel

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

JUDGMENT

RESERVED ON :: 07.08.2025

PRONOUNCED ON :: 14.08.2025

1. The matter at hand is one of uncommon factual contour

and legal complexity. It revolves around a set of circumstances,

both peculiar and legally significant.

2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India assails the penultimate part of the operative

paragraph of order dated 10.10.2003 (Annexure-3) passed by the

Disciplinary Authority, to the extent that the period during which

the petitioner remained in judicial custody from 21.8.2000 to

01.08.2002 shall be treated as period of absence and shall be

regularised as leave without pay. The petitioner has sought

indulgence of this court with following prayer:



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here