Hassan vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2025

0
1


Kerala High Court

Hassan vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2025

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                    2025:KER:47734


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

 TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2025 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1947

                     BAIL APPL. NO. 8041 OF 2025

             CRIME NO.197/2025 OF THRITHALA POLICE STATION,

PALAKKAD AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 16.06.2025 IN

CRMP       NO.3286   OF   2025   OF   ADDITIONAL   DISTRICT   COURT

(ADHOC), PALAKKAD.

PETITIONER:

              HASSAN,
              AGED 41 YEARS,
              SON OF SAYD MUHAMMED, MUTHUMUTTATH HOUSE,
              MOODUR P.O., VATTAMKULAM VILLAGE,
              MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679 578.

              BY ADV SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ


RESPONDENTS:

       1      STATE OF KERALA,
              REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
              HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.

       2      THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
              THRITHALA POLICE STATION,
              PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 534.

               SRI. PRASANTH M.P., PP


           THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01.07.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 Bail Appl. No.8041 of 2025

                                                   2025:KER:47734
                                 -2-

                 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                  --------------------------------------
                   Bail Appl. No.8041 of 2025
                   ------------------------------------
               Dated this the 1st day of July, 2025

                             ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’).

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.197 of 2025 of

Thrithala Police Station, Palakkad, registered for the offences

punishable under sections 127(2), 137(2), 115(2), 118(1) and

351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) and

Sections 8, 7, 10, 9(1), 4(2), 3(d), 6 and 5(l) of the Protection of

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘POCSO Act‘)

3. According to the prosecution, on 16.04.2025, the

accused took the victim on a motorbike and dragged him inside

the room of a homeo hospital and closed the door and thereafter,

bit on his chest and penis and caused injuries and also assaulted

him with a stick and thereby committed the offences alleged.

Petitioner was arrested on 18.04.2025 and he has been in custody

since then.

4. I have heard Sri.P M Ziraj, the learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as Sri. Prasanth M P, the learned Public
Bail Appl. No.8041 of 2025

2025:KER:47734
-3-

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently

contended that the prosecution allegations are totally false, and

the victim had concocted a false case merely because the

petitioner had warned him of smoking cigarettes. It was also

submitted that the final report has already been filed on

10.06.2025 and therefore further detention ought not to be

permitted.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand,

submitted that the allegations are very serious, and the petitioner

is alleged to have bit the penis of the de facto complainant, apart

from biting on his chest as well as assaulting him repeatedly. It

was further pointed out that the said overt acts on the minor

victim correspond to the injuries noted in the wound certificate

and therefore, considering the nature of allegations, bail ought not

to be granted, as there is every chance that he may influence and

threaten the victim.

7. I have considered the rival contentions and I have

gone through the statement of the victim as well as the wound

certificate. The victim has narrated in detail the heinous acts

committed by the petitioner against him. Apart from assaulting

him brutally, the petitioner is alleged to have indulged in a
Bail Appl. No.8041 of 2025

2025:KER:47734
-4-

perverted behaviour that too without any reason and after

dragging him inside a room. The victim is a fourteen year old boy.

If the petitioner is released on bail, there is every chance that he

may influence the victim or even threaten him.

8. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, I am of the

view that, notwithstanding the final report having been filed and

the petitioner being in custody from 18.04.2025, he cannot be

released on bail.

Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE

ADS
Bail Appl. No.8041 of 2025

2025:KER:47734
-5-

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8041/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED
16/06/2025 IN CRIMINAL MP NO. 3286 OF
2025 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL
COURT OF SESSIONS-1, PALAKKAD.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here