Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Hastimal Meena S/O Jagan Lal Meena vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:1852) on 13 January, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Upman
Bench: Anil Kumar Upman
[2025:RJ-JP:1852]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13529/2024
Hastimal Meena S/o Jagan Lal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Village Post Bilota, Police Station Aligarh, Tehsil Uniyara, District
Tonk (Raj.), At Present Posted As Mts Karmchari Aayur Yoga
Preventive Cardiology Vibhag, Rashtriya Ayurveda Sansthan,
Jorawar Singh Gate, Amer Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present
Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13976/2024
Roshan Kumar S/o Shyam Babu Prasad, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Gram Baleitha, Post Nadol, Police Station Masodhi, District
Patna, State Bihar, At Presently Residies Mts Karmchari Pustkalya
Vibhag, National Ayurveda Institute, Jorawar Singh Gate, Jaipur
(Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).
—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
—-Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16138/2024
Hanuman Prasad S/o Gyarsilal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Bilota,
P.s Aligarh, Distt. Tonk, Currently Suspended From Junior
Assistant, Department Of Land Resources, Head Office Near
Agrasen Circle, Distt. Bhilwara (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined
In J.c. Distt. Jaipur).
—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal
Mr. Manish Kumar
Dr. Mahesh Sharma
(Downloaded on 01/02/2025 at 12:56:07 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:1852] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13529/2024]
Ms. Harshita Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP
Mr. Devendra, CI, SOG, Jaipur
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
13/01/2025
1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483
BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in
connection with FIR No.60/2024 registered at Police Station
Special Police Station(SOG), District ATS & SOG (Raj.) for the
offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 &
120B of IPC and Section 3 /4 of Rajasthan Public Examination
(Prevention of Use of Unfair Means), Act 1992. Later on, police
filed charge-sheet in this matter for the for the offences
punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC
and Section 3, 4 & 6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention
of Use of Unfair Means), Act 1992.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that
the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case.
Counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate.
Petitioner are in custody since their date of arrest and trial will
take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the
petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Investigating officer of this case is present in person and
under his instruction, learned State Counsel submits that
allegations against the petitioners are very grave in nature. He
submits that it is evident from the charge-sheet that in the year
(Downloaded on 01/02/2025 at 12:56:07 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:1852] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13529/2024]
2021, an examination was conducted for the post of MTS and in
that examination, dummy candidates appeared on behalf of
petitioners Hastimal Meena & Roshan Kumar and petitioner
Hanuman Prasad arranged the dummy candidates. He submits
that entire examination system had been ruined by such persons
and such type of offences are soaring in the society. He further
submits that not only dummy candidates appeared in the
examination but they also got appointment and thus, the right and
claim of the laborious and meritorious candidates have been
snatched and taken away by such offenders.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of
the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel
for the parties and looking to the nature of allegation as well as
gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case to allow these bail
applications.
5. Accordingly, these bail applications stands dismissed.
However, observations made herein are only decision of this bail
application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
LALIT MOHAN /87-89
(Downloaded on 01/02/2025 at 12:56:07 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
