Henth Bairiyo vs The State Of Jharkhand on 3 April, 2025

0
57

07/Dated: 3rd April, 2025

1. The instant appeal filed under Section 21(4) of the National

Investigation Agency Act, 2008, is directed against the order dated

11.09.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Chatra in MCA No.

1247 of 2024 by which the prayer for regular bail of the appellant in

connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case no. 74 of 2024 registered

under Sections 147, 148, 149, 120-B, 353, 307, 302, 504, 506, 323,

325, 324, 326, 333 of Indian Penal Code, under Section 27(3) of the

Arms Act, under Section 17(i)(ii) of the CLA Act and under Sections

16, 18, 19, 20, 38 and 39 of UAP Act has been rejected.

2. It has been contended by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant that the appellant has not been arrested from the spot

and have not named in the FIR rather the name of the appellant has

been surfaced on the basis of the conversation amongst the

( 2025:JHHC:10436-DB )

extremist group which was heard by the police personnels.

However, the recoveries were made on the basis of the confession of

the appellant.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here