Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Special (Pocso) Court vs In Re : Imam Sk on 30 July, 2025
30.07.2025
Item no.12
Court No.42
ss HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
C.R.M.(M) 1193 of 2025
In Re:- An application under Section 439 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with
C.Spl. Case No.50 of 2020 arising out of Berhampore Police
Station Case No.620 of 2020 dated 29.06.2020 under Sections
376/370/372/373/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections
3/4/5/7 of I.T.P.A., 1965 and Sections 4/8/12/17 of the
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and Section 75
of the J.J. Act pending before the Court of learned Judge,
Special (POCSO) Court, Murshidabad at Berhampore.
And
In Re : Imam Sk.
…. Petitioner
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Mr. Anisur Rahaman
Mr. Chandan Mondal
….. for the petitioner
Mr. Rana Mukherjee
Mr. Sobhan Gani
… for the State
Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that service
could not be effected upon the de facto complainant/victim.
State is directed to serve a notice upon the de facto
complainant/victim and file a service report on the next date. In
the notice to be served by the State, it should be mentioned that
the de facto complainant/victim has a right to be represented
through a lawyer to be engaged by the Calcutta High Court Legal
Services Committee for which no cost need be borne by the de
facto complainant/victim. The notice should be in a language
which the de facto complainant/victim can comprehend.
List this matter on 5th August, 2025.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)