Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Imranmiya Aiyubmiya Qureshi vs State Of Gujarat on 17 January, 2025
Author: Rajesh Bindal
Bench: Rajesh Bindal
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.254 OF 2025
(@ SLP(CRL.) No. 13049/2024)
IMRANMIYA AIYUBMIYA QURESHI & ORS. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The appellants have been arraigned for the offences
punishable under Sections 302, 34, 323, 337, 427, 504, 506(2), 143,
147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 135 of
the Gujarat Police Act, 1951.
Taking into consideration the fact that the co-accused
has already been granted bail and considering the period of
incarceration, coupled further with the fact that the investigation
is over and that the trial has not commenced yet, we are inclined
to set aside the impugned order and grant bail to the appellants.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2025.01.17
16:59:14 IST
Reason: Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside and the
appellants are granted bail, subject to the terms and conditions
that may be imposed by the Trial Court.
2
The appeal is allowed accordingly, in the aforesaid
terms.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
……………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]
……………………………………………………J.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
NEW DELHI;
17th JANUARY, 2025
3
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 13049/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-08-2024
in CRMA No. 16115/2024 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at
Ahmedabad]
IMRANMIYA AIYUBMIYA QURESHI & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
Date : 17-01-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
For Petitioner(s) Dr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Dharita Malkan, Adv.
Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Kush Goel, Adv.
Ms. Khushboo Aakash Sheth, AOR
For Respondent(s) Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR
Ms. Devyani Bhatt, Adv.
Ms. Neha Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The relevant portion of the order reads as under:-
‘Accordingly, the impugned order stands set
aside and the appellants are granted bail,
subject to the terms and conditions that may
be imposed by the Trial Court.’The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed order is placed on the file)