Ishwar Garg vs Union Of India And Others on 12 March, 2025

0
13

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ishwar Garg vs Union Of India And Others on 12 March, 2025

Bench: Arun Palli, Sudeepti Sharma

           CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
                    2025(O&M)                                                                 -1-


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                            AT CHANDIGARH
                                                  -.-
                                                      CM
                                                      CM-3753-CWP-2025 in/and
                                                      CWP
                                                      CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
                                                      Decided on ::- 12.03.2025

           Ishwar Garg                                                       ....Petitioner

                                                       VERSUS

           Union of India & Others                                           ....Respondents


           CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
                   HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

           Present:            Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

                               Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Sr. Standing Counsel
                                                                  Counsel,
                               for the respondents.

                                                           -.-
           SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

CM-3753-CWP
CWP-2025

1. The present application is filed for
for seeking stay of the coercive aaction
ction

pursuant to the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act
Act, 1961 and

Assessment Order dated 01.03.2025 passed by the Assessing Authority.

2. The main case is fixed for 20.03.2025. On the oral request made by

learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and with the consent of learned counsel

for the respondents,
respondent , the matter is preponed to today itself.

CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M)

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the

Constitution of India with the following prayers:

prayers:-

(i) For the issuance of a Writ in the nature of certiorari quashing

the Notice dated 08.11.2024 whereby the respondent authorities have
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -2-

disposed of the issue of limitation without granting any opportunity to

the petitioner which is otherwise contrary to the judgment of this

Court passed in Kulwant Singh and others Vs. Unio
Union
n of India & Other

and the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of

Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal.

AND/OR

(ii) For the issuance of a Writ in the nature of certiorari quashing

the Notice dated 15.01.2025 disposing of the objections of the

petitioner on the basis of conjectures and surmises.

AND/OR

(iii) And also, For the issuance of a Writ in the nature of certiorari

quashing the Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

by the respondent No.2 for the reason that the same has been passed

without jurisdiction
jurisdiction under Section 149(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act,

1961
1961.


                                                              AND/OR

                               (iv)    In the Interregnum,

um, further proceedings in pursuance to the

Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued by

respondent No.2 may kindly be staye
stayed.

AND/OR

(v) For issuance of any other writ or order as the Hon’ble Court

may deem it.

BRIEF FACTS

2. Brief facts of the present case as per pleadings in the writ petition are

that the petitioner is filing income tax return regularly as mandatorily required to
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -3-

be filed under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He had filed return of

income under Section 139(1) for the Assessment Year 2015
2015-2016
2016 on 31.10.2015

declaring total income amounting to Rs.2,84,510/
Rs.2,84,510/- and exempted income

amounting to Rs.2,68,49,813/-

Rs.2,68,49,813/

The petitioner received notice dated 20.04.2021 issued by respondent

No.2 (Income Tax Officer, Ward-1,
Ward 1, Panipat) under Section 148 for the Assessment

Year 2015-2016.

2016. Pursuant to the notice dated 20.04.2021, he filed return of
o

income on 27.05.2021. Thereafter, the petitioner received notice dated 16.11.2021

under Section 143(2) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act,, 1961.

Aggrieved by the validity of reassessment proceeding
proceedings initiated under Section

148A of the Income Tax
Tax Act, 1961, the petitioner challenged the same before this

Court in CWP-2601
2601 of 2022 titled as “Ishwar
Ishwar Garg Vs. Income Tax Officer &

Others“.

“. The same was disposed of as not pressed in view of the decision dated

04.05.2022 of Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Union
ion of India & Others. Vs. Ashish

Aggarwal”. Thereafter, the petitioner received notice dated 12.03.2022 issued

under Section 142(1) of Income Tax Act by respondent No.5 (The National

Faceless Assessment Centre). Consequently,, in compliance of the decisi
decision
on of

Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Union of India & Others. Vs. Ashish Aggarwal

[2022] SCC Online SC 543”

543 and notification dated 11.05.2022 issued by Central

Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT),
(CBDT) the
he petitioner received notice dated 01.06.2022

under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 by respondent No.2 (Income Tax

Officer, Ward 1, Panipat). Hee filed reply to the same. Thereafter, order dated

25.07.2022
.07.2022 under Section 148A(d) was passed by resp
respondent No.2 (Income Tax

Officer, Ward-1,
1, Panipat), stating therein that as per the information available on

record it is a case of escaped assessment and therefore a fit case for issuance of
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -4-

notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment
ssment Year

2015-2016.

16. Thereafter the petitioner received notice under Section 148 dated

25.07.2022
.07.2022 issued by respondent No.2 (Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Panipat).

The petitioner filed another writ petition bearing CWP No.
No.24081 of 2022 titled as

Ishwar Garg Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block
Block-New
New Delhi

through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others
Others” , which was

disposed of in terms of CWP-18032-2022
CWP 2022 titled as “Kulwant Singh Vs. Union of

India and Others” directing the Revenue to examine each and every case relating

to the ‘deemed
deemed notices’
notices issued under Section 148 of the Act, in the light of the

observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court “”Union
Union of India Vs. Rajeev

Bansal [2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC)”.

(SC) Consequently,
uently, the petitioner received notice

dated 08.11.2024 under Section 142(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 by respondent

No.5 (The National Faceless Assessment Centre) stating therein that notice under

Section 148 has been found to be well within the limits afte
afterr examining the case of

the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in

the case of “Union
Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal
Bansal
” and hee was required to furnish

certain details. Thereafter another notice was received by the petitioner dated

21.11.2024 under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to furnish certain

details. The petitioner received notice dated 09.12.2024 under Sectio
Section
n 143(2) read

with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He filed reply to the same. He

received another notice dated 13.01.2025 under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax

Act, 1961 issued by respondent No.5 (The National Faceless Assessment Centre).

3. Hence the present petition challenging the notice dated 08.11.2024

and 15.01.2025, for the Assessment Year 2015-2016
2016 on the ground of being barred

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -5-

by limitation in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

case of Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal.

SUBMISSIONS

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that notice dated

08.11.2024 issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and notice

dated 15.01.2025 disposing of the objections
objection of the petitioner is contrary to the

judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Rajeev

Bansal [2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC).

(SC)

5. Learned
earned counsel for the respondent
respondents could not rebut the settled

proposition of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India

Vs. Rajeev Bansal (Supra), by which the case of the petitioner is squarely

covered.

6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole

record of the present case.

case

JOINT READING OF JUDGMENTS OF HON’BLE SUPREME COURT IN
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS VS. ASHISH AGGARWAL [2022] SCC
ONLINE SC 543 AND UNION OF INDIA VS. RAJEEV BANSAL [2024] 469
ITR 46 (SC) CONCLUDES AS UNDER:-

UNDER

7. The Finance Act, 2021 substituted the entire scheme of reassessment

under Sections 147
147 to 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 w.e.f. 01.04.2021.

8. Prior to the coming into force of Finance Act, 2021 initiation of

reassessment proceedings was governed by the following provisions of Income

Tax Act, 1961:–

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document

CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -6-

“Income
Income escaping assessment

147 If the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income
147.

chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he

may, subject to the provisions of sections 148 to 153, assess or

reassess such income and also any other in
income
come chargeable to tax

which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice

subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, or

recomputed the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other

allowance, as the case may be, for the ass
assessment
essment year concerned

(hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to as the

relevant assessment year):

Provided that where an assessment under sub
sub-section
section (3) of section

143 or this section has been made for the relevant assessment yea
year,
r, no

action shall be taken under this section after the expiry of four years

from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless any income

chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for such assessment year by

reason of the failure on the part of the asse
assessee
ssee to make a return

under section 139 or in response to a notice issued under sub
sub-section
section

(1) of section 142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all

material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year:

Provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall

apply in a case where any income in relation to any asset (including

financial interest in any entity) located outside India, chargeable to

tax, has escaped assessment for any assessment year:

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document

CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -7-

Provided also that
that the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess such

income, other than the income involving matters which are the subject

matters of any appeal, reference or revision, which is chargeable to

tax and has escaped assessment.

Explanation 1.-Production

1. before
re the Assessing Officer of account

books or other evidence from which material evidence could with due

diligence have been discovered by the Assessing Officer will not

necessarily amount to disclosure within the meaning of the foregoing

proviso.

Explanat
Explanation 2.-For
For the purposes of this section, the following shall

also be deemed to be cases where income chargeable to tax has

escaped assessment, namely :-

:

(a) where no return of income has been furnished by the

assessee although his total income or the tota
totall income of any

other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act

during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which

is not chargeable to income-tax;

tax;

(b) where a return of income has been furnished by the

assessee but no assessment has been made and it is noticed by

the Assessing Officer that the assessee has understated the

income or has claimed excessive loss, deduction, allowance or

relief in the return;





TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
            CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
                    2025(O&M)                                                              -8-

(ba) where the assessee has failed to furnish a report in respect

of any international
ernational transaction which he was so required

under section 92E;

(c) where an assessment has been made, but
but-

(i) income chargeable to tax has been underassessed; or

(ii) such income has been assessed at too low a rate; or

(iii) such income has been made the subject of excessive relief

under this Act; or

(iv) excessive loss or depreciation allowance or any other

allowance under this Act has been computed;

(ca) where a return of income has not been furnished by the

assessee or a return of income has been furnished by him and

on the basis of information or document received from the

prescribed income-tax
tax authority, under sub
sub-section
section (2) of

section 133C, it is noticed by the Assessing Officer that the

income of the assessee ex
exceeds
ceeds the maximum amount not

chargeable to tax, or as the case may be, the assessee has

understated the income or has claimed excessive loss,

deduction, allowance or relief in the return;

(d) where a person is found to have any asset (including

financial interest in any entity) located outside India.

Explanation 3.-For

3. For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under

this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income

in respect
respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue

comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -9-

under this section, notwithstanding that the reasons for such issue

have not been included in the reasons recorded under sub
subsection
section (2)

of section 148.

Explanation 4.-For

4. For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that

the provisions of this section, as amended by the Finance Act, 2012,

shall also be applicable for any assessment year beginning on or

before the 1st day of April,
Ap 2012.

Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment

148. (1) Before making the assessment, reassessment or

recomputation under section 147, the Assessing Officer shall serve on

the assessee a notice requiring him to furnish within such period, as

may be specified in the notice, a return of his income or the income of

any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act

during the previous year corresponding to the relevant assessment

year, in the prescribed form and verified in tthe
he prescribed manner

and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed; and the

provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if

such return were a return required to be furnished under section 139:

Provided that in a case-

c

(a) where a return has been furnished during the period commencing

on the 1st day of October, 1991 and ending on the 30th day of

September, 2005 in response to a notice served under this section, and

(b) subsequently a notice has been served under sub
sub-section
section (2) of

section 143 after the expiry of twelve months specified in the proviso

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -10-

to subsection (2) of section 143, as it stood immediately before the

amendment of said sub-section
sub section by the Finance Act, 2002 (20 of 2002)

but before the expiry of the time
time limit for making the assessment, re-

re

assessment or recomputation as specified in sub
sub-section
section (2) of section

153, every such notice referred to in this clause shall be deemed to be

a valid notice:

Provided further that in a case-

case

(a) where a return has been
been furnished during the period commencing

on the 1st day of October, 1991 and ending on the 30th day of

September, 2005, in response to a notice served under this section,

and

(b) subsequently a notice has been served under clause (ii) of sub-

sub

section (2) of section 143 after the expiry of twelve months specified

in the proviso to clause (ii) of sub
sub-section
section (2) of section 143, but

before the expiry of the time limit for making the assessment,

reassessment or recomputation as specified in sub
sub-section
section (2) of

section 153, every such notice referred to in this clause shall be

deemed to be a valid notice.

Explanation. For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that
Explanation.-For

nothing contained in the first proviso or the second proviso shall

apply to any return which
which has been furnished on or after the 1st day

of October, 2005 in response to a notice served under this section.

(2) The Assessing Officer shall, before issuing any notice under this

section, record his reasons for doing so.

Time limit for notice :-

TRIPTI SAINI

2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document

CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -11-

149. (1) No notice under section 148 shall be issued for the relevant
149.

assessment year-

year

(a) if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment

year, unless the case falls under clause (b) or clause (c);

(b) if four years, but not more than si
sixx years, have elapsed from the

end of the relevant assessment year unless the income chargeable to

tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to

one lakh rupees or more for that year;

(c) if four years, but not more than sixteen ye
years,
ars, have elapsed from

the end of the relevant assessment year unless the income in relation

to any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside

India, chargeable to tax, has escaped assessment.

Explanation. In determining income cha
Explanation.-In chargeable
rgeable to tax which has

escaped assessment for the purposes of this subsection, the provisions

of Explanation 2 of section 147 shall apply as they apply for the

purposes of that section.

(2) The provisions of sub-section
sub section (1) as to the issue of notice sha
shall
ll be

subject to the provisions of section 151.

(3) If the person on whom a notice under section 148 is to be served is

a person treated as the agent of a non
non-resident
resident under section 163 and

the assessment, reassessment or recomputation to be made in

pursuance of the notice is to be made on him as the agent of such non-

pursuance non

resident, the notice shall not be issued after the expiry of a period of

six years from the end of the relevant assessment year.



TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
            CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
                    2025(O&M)                                                             -12-

Explanation. For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarifie
Explanation.-For clarified
d that the

provisions of sub-sections
sub sections (1) and (3), as amended by the Finance Act,

2012, shall also be applicable for any assessment year beginning on

or before the 1st day of April, 2012.

Sanction for issue of notice :-

151. (1) No notice shall be issued under section 148 by an Assessing
151.

Officer, after the expiry of a period of four years from the end of the

relevant assessment year, unless the Principal Chief Commissioner or

Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or C
Commissioner
ommissioner is

satisfied, on the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, that it is a

fit case for the issue of such notice.

(2) In a case other than a case falling under sub
sub-section
section (1), no notice

shall be issued under section 148 by an Assessing Offi
Officer,
cer, who is

below the rank of Joint Commissioner, unless the Joint Commissioner

is satisfied, on the reasons recorded by such Assessing Officer, that it

is a fit case for the issue of such notice.

(3) For the purposes of sub-section
sub section (1) and sub
sub-section (2),
), the

Principal Chief Commissioner or the Chief Commissioner or the

Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner or the Joint

Commissioner, as the case may be, being satisfied on the reasons

recorded by the Assessing Officer about fitness of a case for the issue

of notice under section 148, need not issue such notice himself.”

3.1 In pursuance to the power vested under section 3 of the Relaxation

Act, 2020, the Central Government issued following Notifications

inter alia extending the time lines prescribed under section 149 for
inter-alia
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -13-

issuance of reassessment notices under section 148 of the Income Tax

Act, 1961:

Date of Notification Original limitation for Extended Limitation
issuance of notice under
Section 148 of the Act
31.03.2020 20.03.2020 to 29.06.2020 30.06.2020

24.06.2020 20.03.2020 to 31.12.2020 31.03.2021

31.03.2021 31.03.2021 30.04.2021

27.04.2021 30.04.2021 30.06.2021

The Explanations to the Notifications dated 31st March, 2021 and

27th April, 2021 issued under section 3 of the Relaxation Act, 2020

also stipulated that the provisions, as they existed prior to the

amendment by the Finance Act, 2021, shall apply to the re
reassessment
assessment

proceedings initiated thereunder.

3.2 The Parliament introduced reformative changes to sections 147 to

151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 governing reassessment proceedings

by way of the Finance Act, 2021, which was passed on 28th March,

2021. The substituted sections 147 to 149 and section 151 applicable

w.e.f. 01.04.2021, passed in the Finance Act, 2021, are as under:

under:-

Income escaping assessment-

assessment

“147. If any income chargeable to tax, in the case of an assessee, has
“147.

escaped assessment for any assessment
assessment year, the Assessing Officer

may, subject to the provisions of sections 148 to 153, assess or

reassess such income or recompute the loss or the depreciation

allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such assessment

year (hereafter in this section
section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
as the relevant assessment year).

I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
            CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
                    2025(O&M)                                                              -14-

Explanation. For the purposes of assessment or reassessment or
Explanation.-For

recomputation under this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or

reassess the income in respect of any issu
issue,
e, which has escaped

assessment, and such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the

course of the proceedings under this section, irrespective of the fact

that the provisions of section 148A
148A have not been complied with
with”.

Issue of notice where income has
has escaped assessment
assessment:-

148. Before making the assessment, reassessment or recomputation
148.

under section 147, and subject to the provisions of section 148A, the

Assessing Officer shall serve on the assessee a notice, along with a

copy of the order passed, if required, under clause (d) of section

148A, requiring him to furnish within such period, as may be specified

in such notice, a return of his income or the income of any other

person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act during the

previous year
year corresponding to the relevant assessment year, in the

prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting

forth such other particulars as may be prescribed; and the provisions

of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if ssuch
uch return

were a return required to be furnished under section 139:

Provided that no notice under this section shall be issued unless there

is information with the Assessing Officer which suggests that the

income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in the case of the

assessee for the relevant assessment year and the Assessing Officer

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -15-

has obtained prior approval of the specified authority to issue such

notice.

Explanation 1.-For

1. For the purposes of this section and section 148A, the

information with the Assessing Officer which suggests that the income

chargeable to tax has escaped assessment means
means-

(i) any information flagged in the case of the assessee for the relevant

assessment year in accordance with the risk management strategy

formulated by the Board
Board from time to time;

(ii) any final objection raised by the Comptroller and Auditor
Auditor-General
General

of India to the effect that the assessment in the case of the assessee for

the relevant assessment year has not been made in accordance with

the provisions of this
thi Act.

Explanation 2.-For

2. the purposes of this section, where
where-

(i) a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other

documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A, on or

after the 1st day of April, 2021, in the case of the assessee; or

(ii) a survey is conducted under section 133A, other than under sub-

sub

section (2A) or sub-section
sub section (5) of that section, on or after the 1st day

of April, 2021, in the case of the assessee; or

(iii) the Assessing Officer is satisfied, with the prior approval of the

Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, that any money, bullion,

jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned

under section 132 or under section 132A in case of any other person

on or after the 1st day of April,
April, 2021, belongs to the assessee; or

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -16-

(iv) the Assessing Officer is satisfied, with the prior approval of

Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, that any books of account

or documents, seized or requisitioned under section 132 or section

132A in case of any
any other person on or after the 1st day of April,

2021, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein,

relate to, the assessee, the Assessing Officer shall be deemed to have

information which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has

escaped
caped assessment in the case of the assessee for the three

assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant

to the previous year in which the search is initiated or books of

account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned or sur
survey
vey is

conducted in the case of the assessee or money, bullion, jewellery or

other valuable article or thing or books of account or documents are

seized or requisitioned in case of any other person.

Explanation 3.-For

3. For the purposes of this section, specified authority

means the specified authority referred to in section 151.”

Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice

under section 148

“148A. The Assessing Officer shall, befor
“148A. beforee issuing any notice under

section 148-
148

(a) conduct any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of

specified authority, with respect to the information which suggests

that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment;

(b) provide an opportunity
opportunity of being heard to the assessee, with the

prior approval of specified authority, by serving upon him a notice to
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -17-

show cause within such time, as may be specified in the notice, being

not less than seven days and but not exceeding thirty days from the

date
te on which such notice is issued, or such time, as may be extended

by him on the basis of an application in this behalf, as to why a notice

under section 148 should not be issued on the basis of information

which suggests that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment

in his case for the relevant assessment year and results of enquiry

conducted, if any, as per clause (a);

(c) consider the reply of assessee furnished, if any, in response to the

show cause notice referred to in clause (b);
show-cause

(d) decide,
decide, on the basis of material available on record including

reply of the assessee, whether or not it is a fit case to issue a notice

under section 148, by passing an order, with the prior approval of

specified authority, within one month from the end of the m
month
onth in

which the reply referred to in clause (c) is received by him, or where

no such reply is furnished, within one month from the end of the

month in which time or extended time allowed to furnish a reply as

per clause (b) expires:

Provided that the provisions
provisions of this section shall not apply in a case

where
where-

(a) a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other

documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A in the

case of the assessee on or after the 1st day of April, 202
2021; or

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -18-

(b) the Assessing Officer is satisfied, with the prior approval of the

Principal Commissioner or Commissioner that any money, bullion,

jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized in a search under

section 132 or requisitioned under section 132A, in the case of any

other person on or after the 1st day of April, 2021, belongs to the

assessee; or

(c) the Assessing Officer is satisfied, with the prior approval of the

Principal Commissioner or Commissioner that any books of account

or documents, seized in a search under section 132 or requisitioned

under section 132A, in case of any other person on or after the 1st day

of April, 2021, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained

therein, relate to, the assessee.

Explanation.

Explanation.-For the purposes
oses of this section, specified authority

means the specified authority referred to in section 151.”

Time limit for notice –

“149. (1) No notice under section 148 shall be issued for the relevant
“149.

assessment year-

year

(a) if three years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment

year, unless the case falls under clause (b);

(b) if three years, but not more than ten years, have elapsed from the

end of the relevant assessment year unless the Assessing Officer has
h

in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence

which reveal that the income chargeable to tax, represented in the

form of asset, which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to

amount to fifty lakh rupees or more for that year
year:

TRIPTI SAINI

2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document

CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -19-

Provided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time

in a case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st

day of April, 2021, if such notice could not have been issued at that

time on account of being beyond the time limit specified under the

provisions of clause (b) of sub-section
sub section (1) of this section, as they stood

immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2021:

Provided further that the provisions of this sub
sub-section
section shall not apply

in a case, where a notice under section 153A, or section 153C read

with section 153A, is required to be issued in relation to a search

initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or

any assets requisitioned under section 132A, on or before the 31st day

off March, 2021:

Provided also that for the purposes of computing the period of

limitation as per this section, the time or extended time allowed to the

assessee, as per show-cause
show cause notice issued under clause (b) of section

148A or the period during which tthe
he proceeding under section 148A

is stayed by an order or injunction of any court, shall be excluded:

Provided also that where immediately after the exclusion of the period

referred to in the immediately preceding proviso, the period of

limitation available
available to the Assessing Officer for passing an order

under clause (d) of section 148A is less than seven days, such

remaining period shall be extended to seven days and the period of

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -20-

limitation under this sub-section
sub section shall be deemed to be extended

accordingly
accordingly.

Explanation. For the purposes of clause (b) of this subsection, “asset”

Explanation.-For

shall include immovable property, being land or building or both,

shares and securities, loans and advances, deposits in bank account.

(2) The provisions of sub-section
sub section (1) as to th
thee issue of notice shall be

subject to the provisions of section 151.’

Sanction for issue of notice-

notice

“151. Specified authority for the purposes of section 148 and section
“151.

148A shall be-

be

(i) Principal Commissioner or Principal Director or Commissioner or

Director, if three years or less than three years have elapsed from the

end of the relevant assessment year;

(ii) Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or

where there is no Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director

General, Chief
Chief Commissioner or Director General, if more than three

years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year.

year.”

9. Despite the substituted Sections 147 to 151 of the Income Tax Act,

1961, by the Finance Act, 2021 which came into force on 01.04
01.04.2021
.2021 many

reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were issued

to the assessees after coming into force of Finance Act, 2021 i.e. after 01.04.2021,

which were assailed before different High Courts on different grounds. Different

High Courts quashed the reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income

Tax Act, 1961. Union of India challenged the judgments passed by different High

Courts setting aside reassessment notices under Section 148 of the unamended
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -21-

Income Tax Act, which
which were issued after 01.04.2021 i.e. after coming into force of

Finance Act, 2021 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Union of India

and Others Vs. Ashish Aggarwal [2022] SCC Online SC 543 . Hon’ble Supreme

Court partly allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India. Relevant portion of

the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India and Others Vs. Ashish

Aggarwal [2022] SCC Online SC 543 is reproduced as under:

under:-

“5.. We have heard
rd Shri N. Venkataraman, learned ASG appearing

on behalf of the Revenue and Shri C.A. Sundaram and Shri S. Ganesh,

learned Senior Advocates and other learned counsel appearing on

behalf of the respective assessee.

6.. It cannot be disputed that by substit
substitution
ution of sections 147 to 151 of

the Income Tax Act (IT Act) by the Finance Act, 2021, radical and

reformative changes are made governing the procedure for

reassessment proceedings. Amended sections 147 to 149 and section

151 of the IT Act prescribe the pro
procedure
cedure governing initiation of

reassessment proceedings. However, for several reasons, the same

gave rise to numerous litigations and the reopening were challenged

inter alia, on the grounds such as (1) no valid “reason to believe” (2)

no tangible/reliable material/information in possession of the

assessing officer leading to formation of belief that income has

escaped assessment, (3) no enquiry being conducted by the assessing

officer prior to the issuance of notice; and reopening is based on

change of opinion
opinion of the assessing officer and (4) lastly the mandatory

procedure laid down by this Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -22-

(India) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer and ors; (2003) 1 SCC 72
72,, has

not been followed.

6.1 Further pre-Finance
Finance Act, 2021
, the reopeni
reopening
ng was permissible for

a maximum period up to six years and in some cases beyond even six

years leading to uncertainty for a considerable time. Therefore,

Parliament thought it fit to amend the Income Tax Act to simplify the

tax administration, ease compliances
compliances and reduce litigation. Therefore,

with a view to achieve the said object, by the Finance Act, 2021,

sections 147 to 149 and section 151 have been substituted.

6.2 Under the substituted provisions of the IT Act vide Finance Act,

2021, no notice under section 148 of the IT Act can be issued without

following the procedure prescribed under section 148A of the IT Act.

Along with the notice under section 148 of the IT A
Act,
ct, the assessing

officer (AO) is required to serve the order passed under section 148A

of the IT Act. section 148A of the IT Act is a new provision which is in

the nature of a condition precedent. Introduction of section 148A of

the IT Act can thus be said
said to be a game changer with an aim to

achieve the ultimate object of simplifying the tax administration, ease

compliance and reduce litigation.

6.3 But prior to pre-Finance
Finance Act, 2021
, while reopening an

assessment, the procedure of giving the reasons for reopening and an

opportunity to the assessee and the decision of the objectives were

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -23-

required to be followed as per the judgment of this Court in the case

of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. (supra).

6.4 However, by way of section 148A, the procedure has no
now
w been

streamlined and simplified. It provides that before issuing any notice

under section 148, the assessing officer shall (i) conduct any enquiry,

if required, with the approval of specified authority, with respect to

the information which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has

escaped assessment; (ii) provide an opportunity of being heard to the

assessee, with the prior approval of specified authority; (iii) consider

the reply of the assessee furnished, if any, in response to the show-

show

cause notice
notice referred to in clause (b); and (iv) decide, on the basis of

material available on record including reply of the assessee, as to

whether or not it is a fit case to issue a notice under section 148 of the

IT Act and (v) the AO is required to pass a specif
specific
ic order within the

time stipulated.

6.5 Therefore, all safeguards are provided before notice under section

148 of the IT Act is issued. At every stage, the prior approval of the

specified authority is required, even for conducting the enquiry as per

section 148A(a). Only in a case where, the assessing officer is of the

opinion that before any notice is issued under section 148A(b) and an

opportunity is to be given to the assessee, there is a requirement of

conducting any enquiry, the assessing
assessing officer may do so and conduct

any enquiry. Thus if the assessing officer is of the opinion that any

enquiry is required, the assessing officer can do so, however, with the
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -24-

prior approval of the specified authority, with respect to the

information which
which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has

escaped assessment.

6.6 Substituted section 149 is the provision governing the time limit

for issuance of notice under section 148 of the IT Act. The substituted

section 149 of the IT Act has reduced th
thee permissible time limit for

issuance of such a notice to three years and only in exceptional cases

ten years. It also provides further additional safeguards which were

absent under the earlier regime pre
pre-Finance Act, 2021.

7. Thus, the new provisions substituted
bstituted by the Finance Act, 2021

being remedial and benevolent in nature and substituted with a

specific aim and object to protect the rights and interest of the

assessee as well as and the same being in public interest, the

respective High Courts have rightly
rightly held that the benefit of new

provisions shall be made available even in respect of the proceedings

relating to past assessment years, provided section 148 notice has

been issued on or after 1st April, 2021. We are in complete agreement

with the view taken by the various High Courts in holding so.

8. However, at the same time, the judgments of the several High

Courts would result in no reassessment proceedings at all, even if the

same are permissible under the Finance Act, 2021 and as per

substituted sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act. The Revenue cannot be
substituted

made remediless and the object and purpose of reassessment

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -25-

proceedings cannot be frustrated. It is true that due to a bonafide

mistake and in view of subsequent extension of time vide various

notifications, the Revenue issued the impugned notices under section
notifications,

148 after the amendment was enforced w.e.f. 01.04.2021, under the

unamended section 148. In our view the same ought not to have been

issued under the unamended Act and ought to have been issue
issued
d under

the substituted provisions of sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act as per

the Finance Act, 2021. There appears to be genuine nonapplication of

the amendments as the officers of the Revenue may have been under a

bonafide belief that the amendments may not yet have been enforced.

Therefore, we are of the opinion that some leeway must be shown in

that regard which the High Courts could have done so. Therefore,

instead of quashing and setting aside the reassessment notices issued

under the unamended provision
provision of IT Act, the High Courts ought to

have passed an order construing the notices issued under unamended

Act/unamended provision of the IT Act as those deemed to have been

issued under section 148A of the IT Act as per the new provision

section 148A and the Revenue ought to have been permitted to

proceed further with the reassessment proceedings as per the

substituted provisions of sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act as per the

Finance Act, 2021, subject to compliance of all the procedural

requirements and the defences, which may be available to the

assessee under the substituted provisions of sections 147 to 151 of the

IT Act and which may be available under the Finance Act, 2021 and

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -26-

in law. Therefore, we propose to modify the judgments and orders

passed by the respective High Courts as under: –

(i) The respective impugned section 148 notices issued to the

respective assessees shall be deemed to have been issued under

section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act,

2021 and treated to be show
show-cause
cause notices in terms of section

148A(b). The respective assessing officers shall within thirty

days from today provide to the assessees the information and

material relied upon by the Revenue so that the assessees can

reply to the notices within two week
weeks thereafter;

(ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry with the prior

approval of the specified authority under section 148A(a) be

dispensed with as a one-time
time measure vis
vis-a-vis
vis those notices

which have been issued under Section 148 of the unamended

Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been

quashed by the High Courts;

(iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass an order in

terms of section 148A(d) after following the due procedure as

required under section 148A(b) in respe
respect
ct of each of the

concerned assessees;

(iv) All the defences which may be available to the assessee

under section 149 and/or which may be available under the

Finance Act, 2021 and in law and whatever rights are available

to the Assessing Officer under the Finance Act, 2021 are kept

open and/or shall continue to be available and;
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document

CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -27-

(v) The present order shall substitute/modify respective

judgments and orders passed by the respective High Courts

quashing the similar notices issued under unamended section

148 of the IT Act irrespective of whether they have been

assailed before this Court or not.

9. There is a broad consensus on the aforesaid aspects amongst the

learned ASG appearing on behalf of the Revenue and the learned

Senior Advocates/learned counsel app
appearing
earing on behalf of the

respective assessees. We are also of the opinion that if the aforesaid

order is passed, it will strike a balance between the rights of the

Revenue as well as the respective assesses as because of a bonafide

belief of the officers of the Revenue in issuing approximately 90000

such notices, the Revenue may not suffer as ultimately it is the public

exchequer which would suffer. Therefore, we have proposed to pass

the present order with a view avoiding filing of further appeals before

this
is Court and burden this Court with approximately 9000 appeals

against the similar judgments and orders passed by the various High

Courts, the particulars of some of which are referred to hereinabove.

We have also proposed to pass the aforesaid order in ex
exercise
ercise of our

powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India by holding that

the present order shall govern, not only the impugned judgments and

orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but shall

also be made applicable in respect of the similar judgments and

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -28-

orders passed by various High Courts across the country and

therefore the present order shall be applicable to PAN INDIA.

10. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present

Appeals are ALLOWED IN PART. Th
Thee impugned common judgments

and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in

W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are

hereby modified and substituted as under: –

(i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective

assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of

the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions

before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to

have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as

substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated

to be show cause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The

assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to

the respective assessees information and material relied upon

by the Revenue, so that
hat the assesees can reply to the show-

show

cause notices within two weeks thereafter;

(ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required,

with the prior approval of specified authority under section

148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a one
one-time measure
ure vis-

vis

avis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of

the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those

which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -29-

as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior

approval
al of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the

concerned Assessing Officers to hold any enquiry, if required;

(iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms

of section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned

assessees;; Thereafter after following the procedure as required

under section 148A may issue notice under section 148 (as

substituted);

(iv) All defences which may be available to the assesses

including those available under section 149 of the IT Act and

all rightss and contentions which may be available to the

concerned assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021

and in law shall continue to be available.

11.. The present order shall be applicable PAN INDIA and all

judgments and orders passed by different Hi
High
gh Courts on the issue

and under which similar notices which were issued after 01.04.2021

issued under section 148 of the Act are set aside and shall be

governed by the present order and shall stand modified to the

aforesaid extent. The present order is pa
passed
ssed in exercise of powers

under Article 142 of the Constitution of India so as to avoid any

further appeals by the Revenue on the very issue by challenging

similar judgments and orders, with a view not to burden this Court

with approximately 9000 appeals. We also observe that present order

shall also govern the pending writ petitions, pending before various

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -30-

High Courts in which similar notices under Section 148 of the Act

issued after 01.04.2021 are under challenge.

12.. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High

Court of Allahabad and the similar judgments and orders passed by

various High Courts, more particularly, the respective judgments and

orders passed by the various High Courts particulars of which are

mentioned hereinabove, shall stand modified/substituted to the

aforesaid extent only.

10. Therefore, in above referred to judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court

in case of Union of India and Others Vs. Ashish Aggarwa
Aggarwal
[2022] SCC Online

SC 543l,, Hon’ble the Supreme Court held that the impugned notices under Section

148 issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended Section

148 of the Income Tax Act and were subject matter of writ petitions before the

various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under Section

148-A
A
of the Income Tax Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and be

construed or treated to be show cause notices in terms of Section 148A(b). It was

further held that the Assessing Officer shall, within 30 days from the date of

passing of the judgment i.e. 04.05.2022,
04.05.2022 provide to the respective assessees

information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the Assessees can

reply to the show cause notices within 2 weeks thereafter. It was further held by

the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the requirement of conducting any enquiry, if

required, with the prior approval of specified authority under Section 148A(a) is

dispensed with as one time measure viz-a-viz
viz viz those notices which were issued

under Section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 (Finance Act, 2021) till

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -31-

date i.e. 04.05.2022 (Decision in Ashish Aggarwal)
Aggarwal). Further that the
he Assessing

Officer shall thereafter pass orders in terms of Section 148A(d) in respect of each

of the concerned
erned assessees and thereafter, after following the procedure as required

under Section 148A may issue notice(s)
notice under Section 148 (as substituted).

11. On 11.05.2022 following the decision in Union of India and Others

Vs. Ashish Aggarwal,
Aggarwal the Central Board

ard of Direct Taxes issued instructions for the

implementation of the decision in Ashish Aggarwal‘s case (supra
(supra), wherein it was

clarified that the judgment in Ashish Aggarwal would apply to all the cases where

extended reassessment notices were issued, irrespective
irrespective of the fact whether such

notices were challenged or not. These instructions further stated that reassessment

notices would “travel back in time to their original date when such notices were to

be issued and then new Section 149 of the Income Ta
Tax
x Act is to be applied at that

point.” The instructions further elaborated the mechanism for issuing notices

under Section 148 of the new regime. The Assessing Officers accordingly after

considering the replies furnished by the assessees passed orders un
under
der Section

148A(d) and subsequently notices under Section 148 of the new regime were

issued to the assessees by the Assessing Officers
Officers, between July and September

2022, for the Assessment Year 2013-2014,
2013 2014, 2014
2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017
2017 and

2017-2018.

2018. These notices were challenged before several High Courts, who
These

declared the notices to be invalid being time barred and being issued without the

appropriate sanction of the specified authority.

12. In Ashish Aggarwal‘s case (supra) Hon’ble Supreme Court did not

deal with the issue as to whether or not reassessment notices were issued within the

time limits prescribed under the provisions of Income Tax Act
Act, 1961
read with

relaxations provided under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -32-

Provisions)) Act,
Act 2020 (TOLA). Different
ifferent High Courts declared the notices under

Section 148 of the new regime issued to the assessees by the Assessing Officers

between July and September 2022,
2022 for the Assessment Year 2013
2013-2014,
2014, 2014-

                                                                              2014

           2015, 2015-2016,
                      2016, 2016-2017
                            2016      and 2017-2018
                                               2018 to be invalid
                                                          invalid, being time barred and

being issued without appropriate sanction of specified authority
authority. The
he same were

challenged by way of filing the appeals before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in

Union of India and Others Vs. Rajiv Bansal.

Bansal. T
The Hon’ble Supreme Court framed

the following issues in Union of India and Others Vs. Rajiv Bansal :-

“B.
B. Issues

18. The present batch of appeals gives rise to the following issues:-

issues:

a. Whether TOLA and notification issued under it will also

apply to reassessment notices issued after 1 April 2021; and

b. Whether the reassessment notices issued under Section

148 of the new regime between July and September 2022 are

valid.”

13. Before proceeding further it would be appropriate to reproduce the

relevant portion of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case

of Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal [2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC)
(SC). The same is

reproduced as under :-

:

B. Issues

18. The present batch of appeals give
givess rise to the following issues:-

issues:

a. Whether TOLA and notification issued under it will also

apply to reassessment notices issued after 1 April 2021; and

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -33-

b. Whether the reassessment notices issued under Section

148 of the new regime between July and September 2022 are

valid.

C. Submissions

19. Mr N Venkataraman, learned Additional Solicitor General of

India, made the following submissions on behalf of the Revenue:

a. Parliament enacted TOLA as a free
free-standing legislation
on to

provide relief and relaxation to both the assesses and the

Revenue during the time of COVID
COVID- 19. TOLA seeks to relax

actions and proceedings that could not be completed or

complied with within the original time limits specified under the

Income Tax Act;

b. Section 149 of the new regime provides three crucial benefits

to the assesses:

(i) the four- year time limit for all situations has been reduced

to three years;

(ii) the first proviso to Section 149 ensures that re
re-assessment
assessment

for previous assessmentt years cannot be undertaken beyond six

years; and

(iii) the monetary threshold of Rupees fifty lakhs will apply to

the reassessment for previous assessment years;

c. The relaxations provided under Section 3(1) of TOLA apply

“notwithstanding anything contained in the specified Act.”

Section 3(1), therefore, overrides the time limits for issuing a

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -34-

notice under Section 148 read with section 149 of the Income

Tax Act;

d.. TOLA does not extend the life of the old regime. It merely

provides a relaxation for the completion or compliance of

actions following the procedure laid down under the new

regime;

e. The Finance Act 2021 substituted the old regime for re-

re

assessment with a new regime. The first proviso to Section 149

does not expressly bar the application of TOLA. Section 3 of

TOLA applies to the entire Income Tax Act, including Sections

149 and 151 of the new regime. Once the first proviso to

Section 149(1)(b) is read with
th TOLA, then all the notices issued

between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 pertaining to

assessment years 2013-2014,
2014, 2014
2014-2015, 2015-2016,
2016, 2016-
2016

2017, and 2017-2018
2018 will be within the period of limitation as

explained in the tabulation below:

Assessment Within 3 years Expiry of Within six Expiry of
Year Limitation Years Limitation
read with read with
TOLA for TOLA for (4)
(5)
2013-2014 31.03.2017 T O L A not 31.03.2020 30.06.2021

applicable

2014-2015 31.03.2018 T O L A not 31.03.2021 30.06.2021

applicable

2015-2016 31.03.2019 T O L A not 31.03.2022 T O L A not

applicable applicable

2016-2017 31.03.2020 30.06.2021 31.03.2023 T O L A not

applicable

2017-2018 31.03.2021 30.06.2021 31.03.2024 T O L A not

TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -35-
applicable

f. The Revenue concedes that for the assessment year 2015
2015–16,

all notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 will have to be

dropped as they will not fall for completion during the period

prescribed under TOLA;

CONCLUSION

14. A perusal of para 19 (f) of the judgment passed in the case of Rajiv

Bansal (supra) shows that it is conceded position
ion of the respondents, through the

Additional Solicitor General of India, that for the assessment year 2015
2015-2016,
16, all

notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 will have to be dropped as they will not fall

for completion during the period prescribed under TOLA
TOLA.

15. Admittedly, notice dated 08.11.2024 issued under Section 142(1) of

the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015
2015-2016 and disposal of

objections
jections dated 15.01.2025 which are the consequence of notice dated 20.04.2021

issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year

2015-2016, were issued to the petitioner without following the procedure for

issuance of notice as per law amended by the Finance Act, 2021.

16. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner had earlier

approached this Court by way of filing of CWP
CWP-2619
2619 of 2022 which was disposed

of as not pressed,
pressed in view of the decision dated 04.05.2022 of Hon
Hon’ble
‘ble Supreme

Court in “Union of India & Others. Vs. Ashish Aggarwal”

Aggarwal”. Subsequently

petitioner filed another CWP No.24073 of 2022 titled as “”Nisha
Nisha Garg Vs. Central

Board of Direct Taxes, North Block-New
Block New Delhi through Secretary, Ministry of

Finance, New Delhi & Others” which was disposed of by this Court in terms of
TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-4887-2025(O&M)
2025(O&M) -36-

decision in CWP-18032-2022
CWP titled as “Kulwant Singh Vs. Union of India and

Others“. In Kulwant Singh’s case this Court had categorically directed the

Revenue to examine each and every case relating
relating to the ‘deemed notices’ issued

under Section 148 of the Act, in the light of the observations made by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court “Union
“Union of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal
[2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC)
(SC).”

17. In view of the statement made by Additional Solicitor General of

India in para 19 (f) of Rajeev Bansal’s
‘s case (supra), notice dated 08.11.2024

issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year

2015-2016
2016 and disposal of objections
objections dated 15.01.2025 which are consequence of

notice dated 20.04.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for

the Assessment Year 2015-2016
2015 would be barred by limitation.

18. In view of the above, the
the present writ petition is allowed and notice

dated 08.11.2024 issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the

Assessment Year 2015-2016
2015 2016 and disposal of objections dated 15.01.2025 which

are consequence of notice dated 20.04.2021 issued under Section 148 of the

Income Tax Act,
t, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015
2015-2016 are hereby set aside.

19. Pending application(s),
application , if any, also stand disposed of.

               (ARUN PALLI)                                          (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
                  JUDGE                                                   JUDGE

           March 12,, 2025
           tripti
                        Whether speaking/non-speaking
                                             speaking : Speaking
                        Whether reportable             : Yes




TRIPTI SAINI
2025.04.08 09:53
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here