Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Jai @Jignesh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 July, 2025
Author: J.K. Maheshwari
Bench: J.K. Maheshwari
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-E
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9371/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-05-2025
in MCRC No. 15140/2025 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
at Gwalior]
JAI @JIGNESH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s)
(IA No. 149242/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 21-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv.
Mrs. Anushree Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Kartik Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela , AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Against an order rejecting the regular bail by
the High Court and to seek bail, the present special
leave petition has been filed. The petitioner is in
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
1
Gulshan Kumar Arora
Date: 2025.07.21
16:24:22 IST
SLP (Crl) No(s).9371/2025
Reason:
custody w.e.f. 27.02.2024 in connection with FIR No
0030 dated 02.02.2024 for the offences punishable
under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered with Police
Station Lahar, District Bhind, Madhya Pradesh.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties
and taking note of the fact that the case is based
on the documentary evidence, the custody period of
the petitioner is more than one year and six months
and as informed the trial may take some time to
conlude, taking into consideration all the attending
circumstances, we are inclined to release the
petitioner on bail.
3. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner be
released on bail on furnishing the suitable bail
bonds and sureties and on such other terms and
conditions as may be deemed fit by the trial Court.
4. Petitioner to abide all the conditions as
imposed and shall regularly attend the trial until
2
SLP (Crl) No(s).9371/2025
exempted by the Court. Violation, if any, may give
a cause to take recourse as permissible and the
trial Court is at liberty to do the needful.
5. Accordingly and in view of the foregoing, the
special leave petition stands allowed.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR)
AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
3
SLP (Crl) No(s).9371/2025