Jai Prakash Jaiswal And Another vs The Official Liquidator And Others on 5 August, 2025

0
2


Mr. Sudipto Chowdhury

For the
respondent nos.2, 3 and 4 : Mr. Soumya Roy,
Mr. Piyas Choudhury,
Mr. Santosh Singh

For the proforma respondent : Mr. Rishav Banerjee,
Mr. Chandan Mohata,
Mr. Moulinath Moitra

Heard on : 10.07.2025 & 17.07.2025

Reserved on : 17.07.2025

Judgment on : 05.08.2025

2025:CHC-AS:1456-DB
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:-

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff in a suit for

damages/compensation of Rs.60,00,00,000/-, interest pendente lite,

declaration that the plaintiff nos.2 and 3 stand discharged of all

guarantees to the defendant nos.2 to 4/Banks and the consequential

relief of permanent injunction. By the impugned judgment and deemed

decree dated April 9, 2019, the learned Trial Judge rejected the plaint

primarily on the grounds that the suit was barred under Section 80 of

the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 34 of the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security

Interest Act, 2002 (for short, “the SARFAESI Act”).



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here