Jaldu Jaya Lakshmi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 12 June, 2025

0
4


Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Jaldu Jaya Lakshmi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 12 June, 2025

 APHC010282362025
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                       AT AMARAVATI
                                (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                    THURSDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE
                      TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                  PRESENT

       THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

                        WRIT PETITION NO: 14253/2025



Between:

Jaldu Jaya Lakshmi                                            ...PETITIONER

                                     AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others                   ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BABUJI TENNETI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE

The Court made the following order:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government

Pleader for Prohibition & Excise for the respondents.

2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of purchase and sale of
jaggery.

2

KM,J
WP_14253_2025

3. It is contended that the 3rd respondent inspected the shop of the

petitioner on 26.04.2025 and seized jaggery weighing 3240 Kgs. Thereafter

Crime was registered in Crime No.207 of 2025 under the provisions of Section

7(B) r/w 8(A) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995 (Amendment) Act 2020 r/w 34(e) of

A.P.Excise Act, 1968 r/w Section 4 of Gur Regulation Order – 1968.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of

G.O.Ms.No.1929, dated 27.12.2006, which exempts sale of jaggery from

payment of tax, no license is required for doing business in purchase and sale

of jaggery. He further submits that the Government vide Memo, dated

20.12.2010 has also recognized the jaggery as agricultural produce.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying on the decision of this

Court in WP.No.12429 of 2022 prays for release of the seized stock.

6. Perused the record. Considered the rival submissions.

7. This Court in WP.No.12429 of 2022, placing reliance on the

decisions of the High Court of Telangana has taken a view that mere

possession and transportation of black jaggery is not an offence. The said

decision of the learned single Judge has been confirmed by the Division

Bench vide order, dated 21.07.2022 in WA.No.596 of 2022.

8. Having regard to the same, this Court deems it appropriate to

dispose of the writ petition with the following directions.
3

KM,J
WP_14253_2025

9. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to

release the jaggery seized from the petitioner in connection with F.I.R.No.207

of 2025 of the Prohibition & Excise Station, Chintalapudi, Eluru, upon

furnishing of personal bond for value of the jaggery seized. The said release

shall be subject to the result of the confiscation proceedings in F.I.R.No.207 of

2025. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________________
JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 12.06.2025
Note: Issue CC by 13.06.2025
(B/o)
Vjl
4
KM,J
WP_14253_2025

05
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 14253 of 2025

12.06.2025
Vjl



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here