Janardan Yadav vs State Of U.P on 6 August, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Janardan Yadav vs State Of U.P on 6 August, 2025

Bench: Sudhanshu Dhulia, Aravind Kumar

                                                           1

     ITEM NO.12                                   COURT NO.7                   SECTION II

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                          No(s).    11351/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-05-2025
     in CRMBA No. 13476/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
     Allahabad]

     JANARDAN YADAV                                                             Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     STATE OF U.P.                                                              Respondent(s)

     FOR ADMISSION , IA No. 181673/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

     Date : 06-08-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

     For Petitioner(s)                     Mr. Durgesh Singh, Adv.
                                           Mr. Saurabh Upadhyay, Adv.
                                           Mr. Akash Yadav, Adv.
                                           Mr. Amit Upadhyay, Adv.
                                           Mr. Salil Dixit, Adv.
                                           Ms. Anshika Pandey, Adv.
                                           Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is an accused for the offences punishable

under Sections 363/506/306/376(3) of the Indian Penal Code and

Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. His 2nd application for bail was
Signature Not Verified
dismissed by the High Court. Being aggrieved, he had
Digitally signed by
Nirmala Negi
Date: 2025.08.08
12:48:43 IST
Reason: approached this Court.

Considering the nature of the case and the allegations

against him and the fact that all prosecution witnesses have
2

been examined and even the statement of the petitioner under

Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been

recorded.

Under these circumstances, we do not think a case of bail

is made out at this stage.

The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(NIRMALA NEGI)                                           (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR