Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Jaskaran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:33107) on 28 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:33107]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7305/2025
Jaskaran S/o Moolchand, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Ward
No 10 Chopaniya Ka Mohalla Deshnok Bikaner (Raj.) (At Present
Lodged At District Jail Bikaner)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecuter
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishank Madhan.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP.
Mr. Kaushal Gautam for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
28/07/2025
1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439
Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.69/2025 registered at Police Station
Deshnok, District Bikaner, for offences under Sections 110, 115,
126(2), 119(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He
further contends that out of the injured persons, two have
sustained simple injuries and only one person, namely Shiv
Kumar, has suffered a grievous injury.
4. Learned counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to the
injury report and specifically submitted that the doctor has not
opined that the injury sustained by Shiv Kumar was dangerous to
life, nor has any specific role been attributed to the petitioner
indicating infliction of such grievous injury. It is also submitted
(Downloaded on 28/07/2025 at 09:45:24 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33107] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7305/2025]
that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.06.2025
and the charge-sheet has already been filed.
5. Learned counsel for the complainant contends that the
petitioner is actively involved in the alleged incident and that the
complainant’s nephew has sustained injuries as a result of the
assault.
6. Learned Public Prosecutor also vehemently opposed the bail
application, but is not in a position to refute the fact that the
doctor has not opined any injury to be dangerous to life. He also
does not dispute that the charge-sheet has already been filed.
7. Having considered the rival submissions, the nature of the
allegations, the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since
05.06.2025, that the charge-sheet has already been filed, as well
as the likelihood of delayed conclusion of trial and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court
deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
8. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner
Jaskaran S/o Moolchand, arrested in connection with F.I.R.
No.69/2025 registered at Police Station Deshnok, District Bikaner,
shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided
he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his
appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and
whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
65-/Jitender//-
(Downloaded on 28/07/2025 at 09:45:24 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)