Jitendra Arvindbhai Gandhi vs Rakesh Sharma Proprietor Of Global … on 11 April, 2025

0
13

Gujarat High Court

Jitendra Arvindbhai Gandhi vs Rakesh Sharma Proprietor Of Global … on 11 April, 2025

                                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/7187/2025                             ORDER DATED: 11/04/2025

                                                                                                           undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 7187 of
                                                      2025
                                     In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 13747 of 2025
                        ================================================================
                                       JITENDRA ARVINDBHAI GANDHI
                                                  Versus
                        RAKESH SHARMA PROPRIETOR OF GLOBAL MARKETING SERVICES &
                                                  ANR.
                        ================================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR.DARSHAN A. DAVE(7921) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MS. DHWANI TRIPATHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                        ================================================================
                             CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
                                              Date : 11/04/2025
                                               ORAL ORDER

1. The present application is filed by the applicant – original

complainant under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) seeking leave to file an appeal against

the order dated 03.03.2025 passed by the Court of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Bharuch (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Trial Court”)

in Criminal Case No. 1700 of 2018, whereby the learned Trial Court has

acquitted the respondent No.1 from the offence under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act‘).

2. The brief facts culled out from the memo of the present appeal as

well as the record and proceedings are as under:-

2.1 The applicant and the respondent No. 1 were known to each other

for more than fifteen years and they had friendly relation and the

respondent No. 1 had some financial constraint to run his business for

Page 1 of 4

Uploaded by VISHAL MISHRA(HC01088) on Fri Apr 11 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Apr 12 02:10:54 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7187/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/04/2025

undefined

which he had borrowed an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. Due to the relations

between them, the applicant had given an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- by

cheque dated 03.07.2014 and an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- in cash and in

all an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- was given to the respondent No. 1. That

the amount was not paid for a long time and as the applicant kept on

demanding the amount and on 31.03.2018, the respondent No. 1 gave

Cheque No. “267757” for Rs.,5,00,000/- from his account with IDBI

Bank, Dahisar (E) Branch. The cheque was deposited by the applicant in

his account but the same returned unpaid with the endorsement “Funds

Insufficient”. The demand statutory notice was sent by RPAD but the

same was refused by respondent No. 1 and no amount was paid within the

stipulated time and hence the applicant filed the complaint under Section

138 of the N.I. Act before the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Bharuch, which came to be registered as Criminal Case No. 1700 of

2018.

2.2 The respondent No. 1 was duly served and had appeared before the

learned Trial Court and after the plea of the applicant was recorded, the

entire evidence of the applicant was taken on record. After the evidence

was appreciated, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bharuch was

pleased to pass the impugned judgment and order of acquittal and acquit

the respondent No. 1 from the offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act.

Page 2 of 4

Uploaded by VISHAL MISHRA(HC01088) on Fri Apr 11 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Apr 12 02:10:54 IST 2025

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7187/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/04/2025

undefined

3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned order, the

applicant has preferred the present application seeking leave to file an

appeal under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023.

4. Heard learned advocate Mr. Darshan A Dave appearing for the

applicant, learned APP Ms. Dhwani Tripathi for the respondent No. 2 –

State. Perused the judgment and order passed by the learned trial Court.

5. Learned advocate Mr. Darshan A Dave for the applicant submits

that during the trial talks of settlement were going on between them and

the respondent No. 1 agreed to repay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- to

Rs.7,00,000/- towards the outstanding amount as, in all four matters were

pending before the learned Trial Court between the parties and in all

amount of Rs.15,00,000/- was required to be paid by the applicant . The

learned Trial Court, after considering the arguments of learned advocates

for the parties and the evidence on record concluded that the applicant

had proved his debt as in fact the amount has been given to the

respondent No. 1 but as the cheques were issued after the period of

limitation, considering the period of limitation i.e. three years had elpased

, concluded that the debt was time barred debt and has passed the

impugned judgment and order of acquittal. Learned advocate for the

applicant submits that in fact, the issuing of the cheque in question for

Page 3 of 4

Uploaded by VISHAL MISHRA(HC01088) on Fri Apr 11 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Apr 12 02:10:54 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7187/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/04/2025

undefined

the time barred amount were itself a fresh agreement in light of the

provision of Section 25 (3) of the Indian Contract Act, and it was a

legally enforceable debt, towards which the cheque in question was

issued but the learned Trial Court has not appreciated this fact. The

applicant has a good case on merits and hence, the application seeking

leave to appeal must be granted.

6. Learned APP Ms. Dhwani Tripathi for the respondent No 2 – State

has submitted that the learned Trial Court has appreciated the evidence

and has passed the impugned judgment and order of acquittal and hence

the application seeking leave to appeal must be rejected.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned advocate for the

applicant as well as upon perusal of the paper book produced on record

by the learned advocate, it prima facie appears that the learned Trial

Court has not appreciated all the evidence produced on record by the

applicant in proper perspective and hence, the application seeking leave

to appeal deserves consideration. Consequently, the same is allowed.

(S. V. PINTO,J)
VVM

Page 4 of 4

Uploaded by VISHAL MISHRA(HC01088) on Fri Apr 11 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Apr 12 02:10:54 IST 2025



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here