Jitendra Vishnoi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27311) on 17 June, 2025

0
34

[ad_1]

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Jitendra Vishnoi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27311) on 17 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:27311]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                         JODHPUR
       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6946/2025

Jitendra Vishnoi S/o Shri Papparam, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
180-181 Mahadev Nagar, P.S. Banar, Jodhpur Rajasthan.
(At Present Lodged In District Jail, Bikaner)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.        State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2.        Chaina Ram Bishnoi S/o Thana Ram, R/o 17, Krishna
          Nagar, Sangariya Fanta, Basni, Jodhpur (Raj.)
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Ram Niwas Choudhary
                                 Mr. Tan Singh
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, Public
                                 Prosecutor
                                 Mr. Arun Kumar for the complainant



     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

(VACATION JUDGE)

Order

17/06/2025

This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439

Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in

connection with F.I.R. No.283/2024, registered at Police Station

Basni, District – Jodhpur City West for offences under Sections

103(1), 61(2)(a) of the BNS and Sections 3/25 & 5/27 of the Arms

Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Public

Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. Perused

the material available on record.

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:37:40 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27311] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6946/2025]

As per the case of the prosecution, the complainant

Chenaram has given a written report to the effect that on

08.10.2024, his nephew Subhash has received a message through

mobile/Instagram from someone who asked him to meet in the

street near Arjun Studio in front of Sangariya Fanta Govt. school.

Then at about 2:30 pm, his nephew went there in his motorcycle.

Then, two persons after parking their motorcycle on main road,

came in the street and one persons fired 3-4 bullets on his

nephew. On seeing this some persons came from nearby but the

accused persons ran away from the spot. His nephew was taken

to the Hospital in injured condition. Subhash succumbed to the

bullets injuries. The complainant levelled the allegation of murder

of Subhash upon Jitendra and other two accused persons.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that accused-

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He

further submitted that neither the accused was present at the

scene of occurrence nor his location has been found near the spot.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the

juvenile ‘A’ has been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of

this Court vide order dated 27.05.2025, passed in S.B. Criminal

Misc. Bail Application No.438/2025.

He further submitted that upon perusal of the CCTV footage,

a specific averment has been made to the effect that it was the

co-accused Mohd. Ashif who discharged the firearm upon the

deceased Subhash.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the

challan has been filed in the case and the accused is in judicial

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:37:40 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27311] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6946/2025]

custody since since long and the trial of the case will take

sufficiently long time, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be

enlarged on bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel

for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application

and submitted that accused has committed a heinous crime of

murder of Subhash, the nephew of the complainant. He is the

master mind in hatching the conspiracy of murder of Subhash. At

his instance, juvenile A and the co-accused Mohd. Ashif called

Subhash in the street near Arjun Studio in front of Sangariya

Fanta Govt. school, where Mohd. Ashif fired 3-4 bullets on his

nephew. Subhash succumbed to the bullets injuries. The

complainant has also levelled the allegation of murder upon the

present petitioner and other two accused persons. Therefore, he

prayed that looking to the gravity of the offence, benefit of bail

may not be extended to the petitioner.

The allegations against the present petitioner is that he

along with other accused persons has hatched a criminal

conspiracy to commit murder of Subhash. Upon perusal of the

CCTV footage, a specific averment has been made to the effect

that it was the co-accused Mohd. Ashif who discharged the firearm

upon the deceased Subhash at that time co-accused Mohd. Ashif

was accompanied with juvenile ‘A’. The said juvenile ‘A’ has been

enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court and the main

allegation of firearm are on co-accused Mohd. Ashif.

On the information under Section 23(2) of the Indian

Evidence Act, the facts of involvement of present petitioner in

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:37:40 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27311] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6946/2025]

hatching the criminal conspiracy of committing murder of Subhash

has come on record. Whether the present petitioner was actually

involved in the conspiracy of commission of murder of Subhash or

not, the same can be ascertained only after recording of the

statements of the witnesses. The challan has already been filed in

the matter. There is no other criminal case pending against the

present petitioner. The trial of the case will take sufficiently long

time.

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on

merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

petitioner on bail.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner

Jitendra Vishnoi S/o Shri Papparam, arrested in connection

with F.I.R. No.283/2024, registered at Police Station Basni, District

– Jodhpur City West, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any

other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-

and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of

learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each &

every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till

completion of the trial.

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),VJ
215-Ramesh Goyal, P.S/-

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:37:40 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here