K. Nagaratnam, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 19 June, 2025

0
1

2. As all these three Writ Petitions have raised common issues, the three
Writ Petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this Common
Order.

3. For the sake of convenience, the facts emerging from W.P.No.6790 of
2024 are referred to in this Common Order.

4. The relief sought in this Writ Petition (W.P.No.6790 of 2024) is as under:

“In view of the facts and circumstances, it is humbly
prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any
appropriate Writ, Order, Direction more particularly one in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the
respondents herein in not paying compensation to the
petitioners as per the provisions of Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and issuing
proceedings in ROC.G2/2095 /2016 dated 24.06.2016 issued
by the 2nd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of
Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and
consequently set-aside the proceedings in
ROC.G2/2095/2016 dated 24.06.2016 issued by the 2nd
respondent and pay compensation by following the procedure
contemplated under the provisions of Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 by following the
order dated 24.09.2021 in W.P. No. 16739 of 2020 and to
pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems
fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here