1. Leave granted.
2. The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, vide its judgment and order
dated 3rd March, 20201, allowed a writ petition2 of the respondents and
thereby reversed the judgment and order dated 13th February, 2019 of the
Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench3. The Tribunal allowed an
original application4 filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals
Act, 1985 by the appellant. Such reversal is the subject matter of challenge
in the lead appeal.
3. The appellant applied for a review5 of the impugned order (dated 3rd March,
2020). Although it was sought to be pointed out on behalf of the appellant
that there was an error apparent on the face of the record (because the
impugned order
Tribunal
OA No. 170/00178/2018
High Court had considered Office Memorandum6 dated 19th May, 2009 and
that the appellant had been granted Grade Pay of Rs.6600 long before such
office memorandum was brought into effect), the High Court proceeded to
dismiss the review by an order dated 1st April, 2022 resting on the law
declared by this Court in Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati7. The order dated
1st April, 2022 is under challenge in the connected appeal.
[ad_1]
Source link
