Kadiyala Pavan Kumar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 August, 2025

0
2


Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Kadiyala Pavan Kumar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 August, 2025

APHC010386662025
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                 AT AMARAVATI                       [3521]
                          (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST
                    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

                    CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7878/2025

Between:

  1. KADIYALA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O K. SUBBA RAO, AGED 25 YEARS,
     R/O KADIYALAVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, SAMBEPALLI MANDAL,
     ANNAMAYYA (KADAPA) DISTRICT.

  2. MOTHUPALLI SATISH CHANDRA, S/O RAMANJULU NAIDU, AGED
     25 YEARS, R/O GUDIYAVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, SAMBEPALLI
     MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA (KADAPA)DISTRICT.

                                             ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

                                  AND

   THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Station House Officer, Prohibition
   and Excise Station, Kadapa, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of
   Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi.

                                         ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

   MATADA YUVASIVA SWAMY

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

   PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                                      2
                                                                       Dr. YLR, J
                                                           Crl.P.No.7878 of 2025
                                                               Dated 05.08.2025

The Court made the following:


ORDER:

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections

480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity

‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 on

bail in Cr.No.48 of 2025 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Kadapa, Kadapa

District, registered against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 herein for

the offences punishable under Section 8(c) read with 20 (b) (ii) (B) of the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the

NDPS Act‘).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 05.07.2025, on receipt of

credible information, the Prohibition and Excise personnel, Kadapa, along

with their staff and mediators, reached the eastern side of FM Bakers &

Food Palace located on Utukur Circle to Rayachoty Bus Road and noticed

one person sitting on a two-wheeler and five others standing around him

with bags in their hands. On seeing the officials, the persons attempted to

run away. The Inspector of Police, along with his staff, apprehended five of

them, while one person dropped his bag and fled from the scene of
3
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7878 of 2025
Dated 05.08.2025

offence. The police seized 1.2 kgs of Ganja, five mobile phones, and a two-

wheeler, and arrested the accused under the cover of a mahazarnama.

3. Mr. M.Yuvasiva Swamy, the learned counsel for the petitioners

contends that the petitioners are innocent of the alleged offence and have

been falsely implicated by the police. It is further submitted that the petitioners

are the sole earning members of the family and, therefore, their continued

incarceration would cause undue hardship to their dependents. The

petitioners undertake to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed

by this Court. In light of the foregoing, learned counsel prays that the present

petition be allowed in the interest of justice.

4. Per contra, Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioners, submitting that the

investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be

examined. It is contended that if the petitioners are released on bail at this

stage, there is a strong likelihood that they may abscond, thereby hampering

the ongoing investigation and evading the process of law. In view of the

foregoing, it is urged that the petition be dismissed.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant

Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

6. As seen from the record, the petitioners were found in possession of

320 and 200 Grams of ganja respectively. The Investigating Officer recovered
4
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7878 of 2025
Dated 05.08.2025

1.2 Kgs of Ganja in totally from the six (06) accused in this case. The

petitioners were arrested on 05.07.2025 and they have been in judicial

custody for the past 30 days.

7. Considering the period of detention undergone by the petitioners in

judicial custody for the past 30 days, the nature and gravity of allegations

levelled against the petitioners, and their alleged role played in this case, this

Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with the following stringent

conditions:

i. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on

bail subject to they executing a personal bond for a sum of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), each with two sureties

each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned

Special Judicial Magistrate for Prohibition and Excise Offences,

Kadapa, Kadapa District.

ii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before

the Station House Officer concerned on every Saturday in

between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the

learned the Trial Court.

iii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not leave the

limits of the District without prior permission from the Station

House Officer concerned.

5

Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7878 of 2025
Dated 05.08.2025

iv. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not commit or

indulge in commission of any offence in future.

v. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall cooperate with the

investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall

make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating

officer as and when required.

vi. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not, directly or

indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her

from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

vii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall surrender their

passports, if any, to the investigating officer. If they claim that

they do not have passports, they shall submit an affidavit to that

effect to the Investigating Officer.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed.

_________________________
DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 05.08.2025
RSI
6
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7878 of 2025
Dated 05.08.2025

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7878 of 2025

Date: 05.08.2025

RSI



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here