Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Kalpeshbhai @ D.I. Mahendrakumar Patel vs The State Of Gujarat on 22 January, 2025
Bench: J.K. Maheshwari, Aravind Kumar
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 16794/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-10-2024
in CRMA No. 15831/2024 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at
Ahmedabad]
KALPESHBHAI @ D.I. MAHENDRAKUMAR PATEL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
(IA No. 278267/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 22-01-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sameer Kumar, AOR
Mr. Bhavin Satwara, Adv.
Ms. Somi Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Maulik Sayni, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR
Ms. Devyani Bhatt, Adv.
Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1) Against rejection of successive application for
regular bail by the High Court, the present special leave
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
NIDHI AHUJA
Date: 2025.01.24
petition has been filed seeking bail.
17:18:12 IST
Reason:
2) The petitioner is in custody w.e.f. 27.06.2023 in
1
SLP (Crl.) No. 16794/2024
connection with FIR No.11191045221193/2022 dated 28.12.2022
for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465,
468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and
Section 12 of the Passports Act, 1967, registered with Sola
High Court Police Station, Ahmedabad.
3) Having considered the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the parties and taking note of the period of
incarceration and also considering the fact that while
disposing of the previous special leave petition(SLP
(Crl.)No. 1893/2024) filed by the petitioner, we had
observed that in case the trial is not concluded within a
period of four months, the petitioner would be at liberty to
renew the prayer before the High Court and such prayer
having been made has been negatived by the High Court we are
of the view that notwithstanding, the earlier bail
application having been rejected, petitioner is entitled for
being enlarged on bail on trial is not concluded. Hence,
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we
deem it proper to release the petitioner on bail.
4) Accordingly, we direct to release the petitioner on
bail on furnishing the suitable bail bonds and sureties and
on such other terms and conditions as deemed fit by the
trial Court.
5) Petitioner to abide by all the conditions so imposed
and shall regularly attend the trial until exempted by the
2
SLP (Crl.) No. 16794/2024
Court. Respondents are at liberty to take recourse under law
if there is violation of conditions imposed by the trial
court.
6) Accordingly, and in view of the foregoing, the special
leave petition stands allowed. Pending application(s), if
any, shall stand disposed of.
(NIDHI AHUJA) (ANJALI PANWAR)
AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
3
[ad_1]
Source link