Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Kalyan Prasad vs Board Of Revenue Ajmer And Ors … on 11 March, 2025
Author: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
[2025:RJ-JP:10989]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9629/2011
Kalyan Prasad (since deceased) through his legal heir:
Shiv Dayal S/o Lt. Sh. Kalyan Prasad, aged 56 years, R/o Village
Dhandhupura, Tehsil and Distt. Karauli
----Petitioner
Versus
1.Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer.
2.Revenue Appellate Authority, Sawai Madhopur.
3.District Collector, Karauli.
Proforma Respondents
4.Ramcharan S/o Budhram
5.Purshottam S/o Sukha
6.Deendayal S/o Kalua
7.Rewti Prasad S/o Heera Lal
8.Magan Lal S/o Gajadhar
9.Kailash Chand S/o Raghunath
10.Kumher Chand S/o Sheoji
11.Deendayal S/o Heera Lal (since deceased) through his legal
representatives:
11/1.Soto Devi Wife of Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 80 years,
11/2.Lajja Ram S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 40 years,
11/3.Ramsahay S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 32 years,
11/4.Dilip S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 30 years,
11/5.Bhagwan Sahay S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 28 years,
11/6.Raju S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 18 years,
12.Dinesh Chand S/o Kalua
13.Ashok Kumar S/o Gulab
14.Bheem Sen S/o Ram Charan
All are residents Dhandhupura, Tehsil and District Karauli.
——-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by
Ms. Meenal Bhargava
Mr. Siddharth Singh
Mr. Gaurav Sharma for
Mr. Rinesh Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC assisted by
Ms. Gunjan Chawla
Mr. Virendra Singh
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
11/03/2025
(Downloaded on 11/03/2025 at 09:58:50 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:10989] (2 of 2) [CW-9629/2011]
This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed
and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:-
1. The order dated 04.03.2011 passed by the Board of
Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer in Appeal No.11301/2000: Kalyan
Prasad versus Ramcharan & Ors. is quashed and set aside.
2. The petitioner is held entitled for issuance of Patta.
3. The parties would abide by the terms of the compromise
deed dated 18.12.2024 entered into in between them.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/13
(Downloaded on 11/03/2025 at 09:58:50 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)