Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kamal Singh Panwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 August, 2025
Author: Subodh Abhyankar
Bench: Subodh Abhyankar
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:20958
1 MCRC-30579-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR
ON THE 6 th OF AUGUST, 2025
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 30579 of 2025
KAMAL SINGH PANWAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Appearance:
Shri Manu Maheshwari - Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Tarun Pagare - G.A. appearing on behalf of Advocate General.
ORDER
1. They are heard. Perused the case diary / challan papers.
2. This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 483
of BNSS, 2023 / 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he / she is implicated
in connection with Crime No.451/2024 registered at Police Station Kanwan,
District Dhar (MP) for offence punishable under Section 126(2), 191(2), 191(3),
190, 296, 115(2), 125, 324(4), 351(3), 109 of BNS, 2023. The applicant is lodged
in jail since 24/02/2025.
3. Allegation against the applicant is of assault along with other 7 accused
persons.
4. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the main accused Ishwar has
already been granted bail by this Court in M.Cr.C. No.24648/2025 vide order
dated 30/06/2025 and the case of the present applicant is on better footing as
although it is alleged against the applicant that he assaulted with a knife to Ishwar
S/o Dodiya of complainant party, against whom also, a case has been registered
and otherwise also, he has criminal antecedents under Section 307 registered at
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI
Signing time: 8/7/2025
11:44:18 AM
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:20958
2 MCRC-30579-2025
crime No.379/2022 and crime No.234/2023 under Section 327, 384, 341, 323 of
IPC. Thus, it is submitted that the complainant side also had criminal antecedents
and in such circumstances, further custody of the applicant is not necessary and
even otherwise, the dispute in the present case had arisen out of a land dispute.
5. Counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand has opposed the
prayer and it is submitted that no case for grant of bail is made out.
6. Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the case diary,
this Court finds force with the contentions raised by learned counsel for the
applicant, and further taking note of the fact that the final conclusion of the trial is
likely to take sufficient long time, in the considered opinion of this Court, the
applicant’s application deserves to be allowed.
7. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the
application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be
released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (rupees
twenty five thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction
of the trial Court for his/her regular appearance before the trial Court during trial
with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the court concerned
during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437
(3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
Certified copy as per rules.
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR)
JUDGE
krjoshi
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI
Signing time: 8/7/2025
11:44:18 AM